Appropriate uses for Linotype

fiver

Well-Known Member
that's not bad at all.
it was 1.40 here the last time I checked the print shop.
I've seen it at 2.00 a lb and it sold pretty easily at that.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
Tried this combination this past Spring. Used 5# ingot bars from RotoMetals. Air cooled BHN was in the range of 8-9, while heat treated was only 16 BHN. Rick measured the BHN on his tester, about a week later. Have not shot these bullets, as yet. Might try adding 1% tin to raise the BHN, slightly......or try 3 parts lead to 2 parts lino.

My alloy calculations:

3/1 = 96 Pb - 3 Sb - 1 Sn

3/2 = 93.6 Pb - 4.8 Sb - 1.6 Sn

Just checked 4 of John's pure lino bullets on the LBT tester. 3 were 20 BHN and one tested 19 BHN. For my money I would call them all 20 BHN and it is pure lino from Roto.
.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
My alloy calculations:

3/1 = 96 Pb - 3 Sb - 1 Sn

3/2 = 93.6 Pb - 4.8 Sb - 1.6 Sn

I didn't do the math but assuming accuracy with your percentages your previous results with 3/1 alloy are quite close to were they should be.
.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
that's within the 21-22 you'd expect from a 4/12 alloy.

now the question is what did he mix up to get that 8-9 bhn earlier?
1 too many lead ingots would be my guess.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
now the question is what did he mix up to get that 8-9 bhn earlier?

In post #19 of this thread he posted his alloy which I quoted here. 3/1 - 3 pounds pure Roto lead to 1 pound Roto lino. By his math it's <3/1 = 96 Pb - 3 Sb - 1 Sn> and accounts for the BHN numbers he got.
.
 

Ian

Notorious member
He said the 3:1 got him 8-9 air cooled and 16 heat treated from that particular batch, which makes no sense and had us all asking questions.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
He said the 3:1 got him 8-9 air cooled and 16 heat treated from that particular batch, which makes no sense and had us all asking questions.

Yeah it makes sense, I think John was comparing his 3/1 alloy with my CWW alloy. A big difference between the two alloys is a lack of a grain modifier in his virgin lino/pure. A 1/4 to 1/2 of 1% As makes a big difference. As is good for much more than solving pesky spouse problems ya know. o_O
.
 

Eutectic

Active Member
This triggered a memory of something my father said one time. He cast bullets for the 219 zipper from pure lino. At about 3300+ fps, when they struck something, even as small and forgiving as a blade of grass, they would disintegrate to almost a powder.

A properly engineered cast bullet going very fast and contacting live flesh ......... will even make a V-Max quiver!

Pete
 

Winelover

North Central Arkansas
I ran across a post by Outpost 75 (most of us know who he is) on alloys made with just pure lead and lino and their projected air cooled BHN.

Lino to Pure ratio:

1-1 BHN @ 13.5 (< than Lyman #2)

1-2 BHN @ 10.5 (close to 1-20 alloy)

1-3 BHN @ 9.25

1-4 BHN @ 8.5 (close to 1-30 alloy)

So boys and girls.......my 1-3 alloy hardness reflects the results of Outpost's.

Last week I cast some 357 RNFP bullets, using 1-2 (lino to pure) Will have Rick test them for BHN values.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
we were just asking.
I mix 3-1 lino and then mix it 50-50 with ww alloy.
I don't see a lot of drop in the ww BHN when I do that, the AS might be why.
but even the 1-1 mix should be the same as teracorp magnum alloy, and I have always seen that at 15BHN.
the numbers aren't all that far apart in most instances but some of them make you re-look and go huh?
 

CWLONGSHOT

Well-Known Member
There was a time that I cast exclusively with lino type. I was a printer for 20 years I had access to whatever I needed it cast beautifully. It makes beautiful bullets they're just quite hard they don't expand they are brittle but generally they shoot very well.

CW
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
pretty good at tearing up barrels too.

I've heard that off & on for years but have never seen it actually happen. A lot of people were shooting straight lino back when it was common and cheap. It fell out of favor in silhouette shooting not because it was abrasive but because it is so brittle on steel targets.
 

richhodg66

Well-Known Member
Seems like Lyman's recipe for #2 alloy is five pounds lino to four parts pure with a one pound bar of 50/50 solder. I have quite a bit of lino and also pure tin with a steady supply of it from work. This Summer, I want to make up a bunch of #2 alloy and try to settle on using that as much as possible for everything.
 

RicinYakima

High Steppes of Eastern Washington
FWIW, I was told by one of the best CBA Military shooters that about 25,000 rounds of linotype moved his leade forward about .050". I know I am seating '284's made from linotype farther out after 20+ years of match shooting. Compared to my 1995 dummy round, about half a driving band worth.