Contender Rifle

L Ross

Well-Known Member
This is what I wheeled and dealt the .300 Win Mag. into. A Gen1 Contender, MGM 22" octagon .222 Rem. barrel, Bullberry wood. As set up it is unfired. The guy I got it from is a serious Thompson Center geek. He has some one off stuff. He has some of Warren Center's personal guns. I was treated to some real eye candy and was able to buy/trade this beauty.IMG_5821.jpeg
 

Jeff H

NW Ohio
That will be a fine carbine to have at the local range. If I saw it, I would sure stop and gander at it awhile.

I'd get arrested for stalking!:oops:

I've been back to gander at it several time already myself.

The Contender Carbine has become my "ONE GUN," in the form of four complete carbines. Everything they're chambered for is easy to load for, gets along with cast bullets, not too difficult to get and perfectly adequate for any shooting I need to do. My one lone holdout is a CZ527 in 222. Still hard to let go of the Mauser design completely and simply do not intend to go without a 222.

Seeing a smart little tapered octagon 222 like that starts to mess with my head and challenge my convictions. I'd sorted all this out over many years and assembled the perfect, small/manageable personal battery for myself, and @L Ross pulls this one on me.:headbang:
 

L Ross

Well-Known Member
I'd get arrested for stalking!:oops:

I've been back to gander at it several time already myself.

The Contender Carbine has become my "ONE GUN," in the form of four complete carbines. Everything they're chambered for is easy to load for, gets along with cast bullets, not too difficult to get and perfectly adequate for any shooting I need to do. My one lone holdout is a CZ527 in 222. Still hard to let go of the Mauser design completely and simply do not intend to go without a 222.

Seeing a smart little tapered octagon 222 like that starts to mess with my head and challenge my convictions. I'd sorted all this out over many years and assembled the perfect, small/manageable personal battery for myself, and @L Ross pulls this one on me.:headbang:
Well you were the inspiration to me to keep an eye out for a Contender carbine. I never imagined finding one like this though.
 

Jeff H

NW Ohio
Well you were the inspiration to me to keep an eye out for a Contender carbine. I never imagined finding one like this though.

I think I need to inspire MYSELF now! All mine have ugly, black plastic furniture! :)

SSK sells a full complement of new-made spare parts through their site, as well as Haus of Arms. I can't think of anything else you'd ever need for that one though. It's probably the most perfect setup I've ever seen. Can't see any way to improve on what you have there.

Choosing a scope for that one would be my biggest challenge today. On my current 222, I've used a B&L Balvar 1.5-6x32, Japanese Sightron 3-9x40 and now an older Leupold Vari-X II, 2-7x32, which has yet to be zeroed. The Sightron was too big and someone else owns it now. The B&L is heavier than the Leupold and not quite as sleek. We'll see how the Leupold works out.

It seems a lot of guys will buy a Contender (or CZ 527) and add several pounds of bulky wood, bipod and a humongous scope and totally miss the opportunity to carry a super svelte, sleek and light shooter. May be harder to shoot well without all the extra weight and bulk, but it's just one more (little) challenge to feel good about overcoming.
 

L Ross

Well-Known Member
I think I need to inspire MYSELF now! All mine have ugly, black plastic furniture! :)

SSK sells a full complement of new-made spare parts through their site, as well as Haus of Arms. I can't think of anything else you'd ever need for that one though. It's probably the most perfect setup I've ever seen. Can't see any way to improve on what you have there.shooter.

Choosing a scope for that one would be my biggest challenge today. On my current 222, I've used a B&L Balvar 1.5-6x32, Japanese Sightron 3-9x40 and now an older Leupold Vari-X II, 2-7x32, which has yet to be zeroed. The Sightron was too big and someone else owns it now. The B&L is heavier than the Leupold and not quite as sleek. We'll see how the Leupold works out.

It seems a lot of guys will buy a Contender (or CZ 527) and add several pounds of bulky wood, bipod and a humongous scope and totally miss the opportunity to carry a super svelte, sleek and light shooter. May be harder to shoot well without all the extra weight and bulk, but it's just one more (little) challenge to feel good about overcoming.
I am loathe to put any scope on it that looks out of place. I know there is a Leupold 2x7 Compact around here some place. I also kept the Leupold 2x7 Vari-X II that was on the .300. Either one of those scopes should provide adequate magnification for the 50 to 200 yard shooting I envision using this carbine for. The gun is muzzle light and will never make good off hand shooter.
I have a couple hundred Remington 52 grain match bullets for .222 that were in one of those boxes of this and that you encounter at gun shows. I will use those up for barrel break in and just to get acquainted with my new prize.
 

Rick H

Well-Known Member
Choosing a scope for that one would be my biggest challenge today.

I have a Contender Carbine (Nothing that looks as good as yours) with three barrels. A Bullberry 7x30 Waters, a factory 22 Hornet, and a Virgin Valley 22LR. I'm a big fan of the Leupold 2-7x. One rides on the Waters and the whole package comes in at 5.5 lbs. The other barrels wear lesser scopes of similar power. I am a hunter first. I find that a 2-7x fulfills my needs. I have played around in prairie dog towns with varmint rifles carrying higher power scopes and find I usually have them cranked up to no more than 7 power.