New alloy

AKbushman51

New Member
Popper- If I understand you correctly. If I have a known alloy. Say 2% Sn, 2% Sb, 0.17% As, 94.6% Pb . And Zepp it. I would basically sacrifice the Sn %, for the Cu?
bushman
 

popper

Well-Known Member
Ok, XD 40SW (165g PB, 5gr. 231,BLL, 25 yds - really old eyes, see triple front sight) & 336 30/30 (170 PB, 185GC, 10gr. Unique, BLL, 50 yds) using this unknown alloy. All WD from mould. I know, not really groups but the holes are round and barrel is clean. Caldwell front stand for rest. Same boolit with isocore & HiTek 4.5gr. 231 shot the same. 30/30 PB didn't really group either but all were on paper. The GC 185gr actually did reasonable. other stuff on the target was for comparison. I tried NOE GC expander on some old used GCs - did OK but I'll scrap them now, smashed ~ 1/2 of the ones I tried. Oh, 20 mph gusty breeze.
SCN_0163.jpg
 

Attachments

  • SCN_0162.jpg
    SCN_0162.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 5
  • SCN_0165.jpg
    SCN_0165.jpg
    965.4 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:

popper

Well-Known Member
Well my Sb/Cu/Zn test came out pretty good. They cast fine (730F), and when squished in a vice with just Sb/Cu alloy (the normal BO PB boolit alloy) are really hard. No impression in the Zn boolit, good dent in the Cu one. Both were AC & cast Monday. Now to find a triceratops skull to test on. Looks like a high 20 BHN for just a couple cents of added 'stuff' per 10# pot. Don't need H.T. so maybe Hitek will work this time, More tinkering needed. Then on to the HV 308.
 

popper

Well-Known Member
Had some spare time so I cast some 175 40sw from pure & then added Cu by 1 penny weight Zn, CuSO4. Both cast easily in a cold mould, not shootable, just samples. Pound test shows both pounded flat easily. The Pb/Cu/Zn acted quite differently so time to pony up the $20 and get lab testing done. Loaded the 30/30 with the Zn'd boolits (185gr GC) over 16 gr. 2400 just to see - if the chores/weather/grand kids cooperate. Wife just told me I'd be keeping SILs 2 goldens for a week. Darn.
 
Last edited:

popper

Well-Known Member
Success I think. Had been trying a 0.5% Cu/0.17%Zn, BLL in 40SW, got tumbling and leading. Tried again with PC, load is 4.5 gr 231 under a beagled to 190gr. (401-175-TC LEE). No leading, no tumbling @ 25 yds. I applied a SLIGHT tamper crimp this time. Almost missed the target but that was me, OK @ 5 yds. Next experiment is to up the Cu/Zn % and see how well rifle works. Basically I have a cheap alloy that is soft, expands real well (TC turns to a rectangle @ 7' into 3/4" fiber backer). Also shot the BO pistol 100gr. hornady plinkers with 5gr CFE pistol. FUN but the gas was turned down so no cycle - loaded fine from Pmags. Just goes 'pop'. ~2" @ 25 with SeeAll sight. Probably will try 5.5 gr. next. Primers look fine. Also found my MarkIII won't cycle CCI subs - but darn they are quiet.
 

Attachments

  • SCN_0176.jpg
    SCN_0176.jpg
    690.6 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:

fiver

Well-Known Member
that's not much stuff in the alloy.
what do you think about bumping the zinc for BHN and leaving the copper down for the smush it lets the alloy do on impact?
 

popper

Well-Known Member
That's my intent. If I can get something like the low Sb/Cu/Zn I use in the 30/30 with 16gr 2400 180gr GC, I'll be happy. Means for just a few cents soft (SOWW, roofing, range scrap) would work for rifle and expand decent. Of course it has to cast good too.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
that is the question.
I know tin will bind to zinc like glue to paper.
I'm not sure if that would negatively inhibit the tins ability to act as a wetting agent or not.

but I would bet a little bismuth would be a good additive in the solution [paying for it would suck]
it would lower the melt and flow point and add a little BHN at @ the 1% mark without messing with the rest of the mix too much.
 

popper

Well-Known Member
Yes, tin & bismuth are not cheap. Actually I used the Lee ladle (junk) to cast these, worked fine. Test is really to see if Zn will do what Sb does without the brittleness of Sb. And if I can get more used roof jacks I get cheap soft lead. Oh, wife found a pack of Glistin disposal cleaner (cheap) that has the same detergent as Dawn. She decided not to use it so I get it to try in the US cleaner. Got a lot of 308 to clean.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
go easy with the soap amount for cleaning cases.
I found more is not better, and less actually worked best.
a mix with citric acid and agitation seemed to really pull the gunk out of the cases.
 

popper

Well-Known Member
I just used a sprinkle. Clean cases including the pp. Just noting a cheap sub for Dawn. Probably the same as commercial US compound. A sprinkle per 500 cases is cheap.
Edit: this stuff is pure Lauryl THE detergent in most 'detergents'. $2.50 for a lifetime supply. You don't pay for water, color and other additives in Dawn. My prob. was she kept swiping my Dawn bottle for other uses. Note: it will remove the oils from your skin, even in the wash water. It doesn't leave a scum or residue on the cases or in my US cleaner. Works best in hot water.
 
Last edited:

popper

Well-Known Member
Cast some with Zn=Cu 0.3%. Started with cold mould, bottom dropper. Sprue was funny, spinner on top vs just changing color. These dropped 185. I'll BLL & PC some when the rain stops. Haven't done a smash test but they polish with the back of fingernail. Accuracy from last test was bad as Sprue was pounded open & base not real flat. If I just poured one cavity and cut just as spinner stopped I could cut by hand. Maybe accuracy will improve.
Edit: well smash test shows this stuff is WAY too hard. ~ 20 good hits with a hammer and I can't get it smashed to 0.050". Doesn't bend @ ~ 1/10".
 
Last edited:

popper

Well-Known Member
I'll put off more of this test til cooler weather this fall. Need to cast & load for rifle now before the sweltering sets in. It does show one can make a good soft but shootable alloy with pure/Cu/Zn. Think I'll continue tests with Marlin 30/30, see if I can get an alloy that is soft yet accurate for 185gr. 1800 fps+ (would be nice for the BO too).
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
it sounds like it has a lot of structural strength.
it might just be the thing to prevent set back in the rifles, it could prove out at higher velocity's with a flat nose for animal punching.
some water jug testing should show if that is feasible.
 

Ian

Notorious member
That's interesting, Popper. So you are using pure lead and adding equal Cu/Zn @ just .3%?
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
yep,,, just the smaller amounts.
we kind of started this conversation on the other site then brought it over here.
I'm getting close to having the same alloy on hand I just don't have a gun and mold picked out yet.
 

popper

Well-Known Member
Ok, shot some 60/40 isocore/pure in BO yesterday, results aren't bad. Also have 50/50 cast & ready. Added stuff to get 0.5% Cu and 0.22%Zn, 1% Sb. Cast @ 735 (PID) and wasn't bad, 170 PB & 185gr GC - 2x combo accurate mould, even using the Lee pot about 1/4 full. Only problem was keeping the sprue plate hot. I also have to find something to clean the AC oil off the plate - cooked on. Carb cleaner doesn't touch it. Plan tests in 30/30 & BO carbine.