New group?

Ian

Notorious member
I'd just scrape the brass off the side of the frame trying to load it anyway.

I hardly use the loading gates since Oliver Winchester and both the Johns all put the infernal thing on the wrong side of the receiver.
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
turn the gun over to load it.
Maybe lefties aren't smart enough to figure that out?

Then again, why do righties struggle with the single action revolvers? I sure don't.
 

gman

Well-Known Member
I left my Henry right next to 3 of my Marlins. Maybe they will breed and I'll have a new super lever gun. I have no issues being right handed and using the single actions. I always held the gun in my left hand while loading. Same with my double actions. Am I weird?
 

Ian

Notorious member
Funny, nobody is complaining about loading the 39A....

I still think the Mossberg system would make everyone happy.
 

300BLK

Well-Known Member
A 25-20 is the one I want. Well, a 32 HR mag would be good too. Marlins, of course.

I HAD a 25-20 when they reintroduced them, but it didn't shoot well. I SHOULD have kept it and worked with cast, but that was near 30 years ago. I handled a 32 Mag, but thought it pretty heavy, so left it in the rack. I thought the same about the 24" octagon .357.

Have you ever seen the 22 Mag?
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
Never saw a 22 mag.
A 24" octagon 357 would have some heft. I really like the balance of my 24" octagon 45 Colt. Making the bore smaller would upset that balance. Mine handles like a shotgun, great for followup shots on deer.
 

300BLK

Well-Known Member
Funny, nobody is complaining about loading the 39A....

I still think the Mossberg system would make everyone happy.

It was the 1892 Marlin, IIRC, that was convertible RF/CF and loaded via the tube, 32cal.

Back on topic, I wouldn't be hesitant to buy a steel Henry in 357 if they weren't so pricey. I ordered a new 1894c prior to them becoming Remlins, and didn't appreciate paying $425 for it. It wasn't even D&T for a receiver sight.o_O
 
Last edited:

fiver

Well-Known Member
that's why you get the 357 in a 20" octagon. [short rifle]
the little round barrel carbines are like shooting a toy.
the stocks are a bit short and you use your thumb knuckle to set your nose against for aiming.
yep pop every time, but consistent and accurate.

if someone would set a 500$ price point on a good lever gun and break out some decent chamber reamers they could sell a pretty big pile of them.
the reason they don't sel more is because everybody already has 2-3 44 mags and a few 45 colts.
not gonna buy another one.
but a 38-40, 32-20, 41 mag or the like would surely sell those same guy's a new lever gun or three.
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
I would love a heavier 20" barrel on my Marlin 357. The short barrel does make it like shooting a toy. But I would also rather have a heavier 20" barrel on my 300 BO too.
 

Missionary

Well-Known Member
Greetings
Have a 20" Octagon 1892 44WCF ( short rifle) that weights near two pounds more than a standard SRC in 44WCF. That heavy OCT. is nice for sitting and popping critters off cross sticks. But guess what gets left home if there is a bunch of walking to do ?
When a critter jumps and needs popped there is little notice what barrel is on the rifle carbine to me. But getting there 2 hours on foot through woods or river bottoms or across them long bean / corn fields lets me know very well it it is a round barrel or that heavy octagon.
Mike in Peru
 

Rally Hess

Well-Known Member
I always liked the 39M better than the 39A also. I always thought Marlin should offer some more short levers in SS. I've got the 336 SS in .30-30 and love it. Wish my 336 in .44 was stainless.