Chris
Well-Known Member
I found reference to this recently in an article by Dan Lynch, Mt. Molds, regarding evaluating bullet lubes. It was in "The Fouling Shot" magazine but I'll be darned if I can lay my hands on it to provide date of issue.
http://taran.ptosis.ch/taran.html
I have been experimenting with the online version and find it interesting, and overall it's useful for my needs/interests. I don't think everyone will want to use it, particularly in analyzing groups shot with familiar rifles and loads. Experience can provide an adequate analysis in many cases, for example if I try a new powder in an accurate rifle and the first 3 shots are all over the paper I don't need software to tell me to save my money and time.
I think the primary value is in that the software uses each shot as a data point in reference to target or group center. This can be revealing to identify more subtle load changes, i.e. bullet lubes, seating depth, minor alloy changes as examples. Also a great way to compare two loads that superficially appear to shoot equally.
There's a potentially interesting discussion to be had regarding various methods of measuring groups and comparisons of statistical methods.
Edited for spelling, spell Czech let me down once again.
http://taran.ptosis.ch/taran.html
I have been experimenting with the online version and find it interesting, and overall it's useful for my needs/interests. I don't think everyone will want to use it, particularly in analyzing groups shot with familiar rifles and loads. Experience can provide an adequate analysis in many cases, for example if I try a new powder in an accurate rifle and the first 3 shots are all over the paper I don't need software to tell me to save my money and time.
I think the primary value is in that the software uses each shot as a data point in reference to target or group center. This can be revealing to identify more subtle load changes, i.e. bullet lubes, seating depth, minor alloy changes as examples. Also a great way to compare two loads that superficially appear to shoot equally.
There's a potentially interesting discussion to be had regarding various methods of measuring groups and comparisons of statistical methods.
Edited for spelling, spell Czech let me down once again.
Last edited: