Help with 1911 springs

358156 hp

At large, whereabouts unknown.
Very nice Bill! You have reminded me of some fine details that I had forgotten over time. I really need to shoot the 1911s more.
 

Ian

Notorious member
I think we need to preserve Bill's post, or perhaps this whole thread, for future reference. The 1911 is a little out of vogue compared to 30 years ago and much of the basic user's education regarding the platform is being lost. Excellent books abound on the subject, but the basics are easily communicated as they have been here. Mods please consider this as a candidate for Threads of Note.
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
Will do that when I get home Ian.
I can assure you that Bill knows the 1911 well.
When I get time I am going back to KC for more help on my shooting. Might buy a DW 1911 so he will quit pestering me
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
Bill’s post has been added to the threads of note area.
 

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
Very welcome, all. I have shot the platform for about 40 yeas now, and smithed on them almost that
long, doing things like checkering the front of the grip frame, and fitting new barrels, installing new
front sights to get either a better sight picture or taller or shorter sight to get the POI to match the POA.
I have been doing highest grade trigger jobs since the 80s, when I found a book by a former USAF armorer,
self published, out of print for decades. I met him at gun shows and over the years we spent some time
discussing finer points of the design, it was neat tapping into that military target pistol mentality and
skill set a little bit.

There are other things to learn about the gun. I will think about what else might be interesting.

Bill
 

KeithB

Resident Half Fast Machinist
Great reference material Bill, thanks for posting. The 1911 platform will always be relevant.
 

waco

Springfield, Oregon
It is never lost on me the amount of very talented and knowledgeable people we have here. Great group of guys always willing to help and share.
 

Longone

Active Member
Nice write up Bill thanks for taking the time to share.
One little thing that I always do is to put a kink in the plunger tube spring, that little bugger will sail a good distance if your not careful while removing the thumb safety.
IMO while the 1911 is well seasoned it is really a fascination firearm the way it all works together. We as a country are very fortunate to have had people like Mr Browning and Mr Garand develope such amazing firearms for us to enjoy.
 

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
Yes, another design feature lost in the pickup of the 1911 by dozens of new manufacturers.
All the original Colt plunger springs have a factory kink in the middle to keep the spring from
flying out, and the plunger has a snout that retains it to the spring, so that pulling out the
safety won't easily lose the plunger or spring.

There is no question in my mind that JMB was a true genius. Without our modern computer
drafting tools, and mostly in his mind he was able to imagine extremely complex designs and
make them work. So many of his designs have been in production for many decades, because
they are the best solutions. One interesting thing is that I have been told that the current production
FN medium machine gun, called the M240 by US forces, used since the late 70s is basically a
Browning Automatic Rifle flipped upside down with a belt feed top cover in place of the 20
round magazine of the BAR. Of course the BAR was the first successful light, single operator
machine gun which used full power battle rifle ammunition.

Many other JMB designs still in production and in use in militaries around the world, and
by civilians, too.

Bill
 

Ian

Notorious member
They didn't make them for us to enjoy so much as so we could win wars. Fortunately we did win them and civilians have the benefit of their use.
 

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
Oh, and the kink in the spring was a JMB original design feature, lost by some current
makers.

plunger tube spring drawing;.jpg

Doesn't everyone have a full set of original blueprints for the 1911 Government Model?
:headscratch:

Bill
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
I don’t have a set of blueprints for anything.
 

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
I got these to figure out what JMB really had in mind in the beginning.
The original spec on the cartridge is for a .453 diam bullet, and .476 case
diam at the rear, and .473 case diam at the mouth.

Bill
 
Last edited:

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
You don’t trust the current manufacturers to keep it true to the original?
JMB knew what he wanted and it just worked. If people would just leave it alone.....
 

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
Uh, no , Brad. Some do a great job, others, not so much.

The only legitimate improvements have been minor ergonomic things like the beavertail grip
safety and commander hammer, better front and rear sights. Frankly, the original milspec
safety works perfectly for me, and the Colt Mark IV is also perfect for most of us. A long
trigger with a stop suits me slightly better than the standard short trigger, but not a huge
deal.

Magazine 'improvements are questionable whether they are better, a wash or harmful
for most ammo. For H&G 130 loads, I can see needing the early release, but for almost
everything else, not so much, and the parallel lips are proof that the design is a lot more
forgiving of out of spec mags than we have any right to expect.

I have a box stock Ithaca milsurp 1911 that had a slight pitted original bbl, so I
dropped a Colt commercial MK IV bbl into it, zero fitting, just swapped parts. Later I
added a front night sight. Frankly, if that was the only 1911 I could ever have, I'd
be happy with it as a self defense tool. When I first got it, NO changes and with
Evensville WW2 surplus ball I put the first 5 rounds into about 3" at 15 yds. I don't know what
else you might need from an actual military fighting handgun.

Bill
 
Last edited: