Henry test drive

RBHarter

West Central AR
A lifer friend that talks too much about work, politics and life frustrations called late yesterday and asked if it wanted the shoot his new Henry 45 Colts. "Well yeah" !!

So we get to the gravel pit and he gets it out .
Nice lines
Deep sharp checkering on the wrist and fore end.
Matt bluing and satin finish wood of unremarkable grain.
22" heavy bbll (as Colts bbl go)
Short ramp with a brass bead classic V with a centered white diamond below (easy to get on target)
Sling studs for QD swivels
No half cock, I found that odd but whatever.

Man talk about slick ! The lever runs like greased glass with zero bumps . No cam over lock bump , hardly a ripple when the magazine feed is tripped .
The trigger is short and crisp ,while not light neither is it heavy,I'd guess 4 - 4.5 lbs about the same as my field shot guns. The full recoil pad seemed a bit overkill for a pistol cal lever gun but again I don't have to sleep with her so whatever.

Did I mention slick ,smooth action ?


The 1st 10 Bishop manufacturing Division of Federal Ammunition 250 gr RNFP in Starline brass were fired by the proud owner off hand and at 50 yd landed low right and about 8 1/2 x 11 . The 2nd
10 were better but at 50 yd the generous brass bead covered 3 1/2 in of the 4" aim point . These landed in about 8x8 . I find the Rosschester 92' lever loop more comfortable but that may be personal preference the fluid action makes the squared lever less noticed.

By the end of the 1st 50 factory ammo and 1 step of elevation and the old hood leaning rest groups were closer 4x4 and only an inch off POA .

He tells me that $935 got him out the door and just another 110 for 2 boxes of the Bishop/FC and a box of 200 gr CBC ...........
At least I have a supply of good brass once fired .

If it were finished more shiny and less matt an if it is built on the parts as the 41 and 44 mag and capable of the Ruger start loads I'd say it's worth the other $400 over what I paid for the 92'. Assuming that the 92' is a genuine $500 value rifle at 800 the this parkerized Henry would be a good buy .
 

Ian

Notorious member
I was hot to trot for one of those a few years ago, but after finally getting to handle one at a gun show my interest waned. They're really smooth and well built, but they just have no soul. Plain, blocky, big vee-grooves where wood and metal fit, no grace to the shape of the buttstock, finish choices of wood and metal very lackluster, overall I had to pass as much as I want to love everything about the company. Funny, I didn't notice the lack of a half-cock, that alone would have been a show-stopper for me, thanks for pointing that out.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
I don't think so . Which is to say it has the lines but is a steel receiver rather than the brass big boy
I was given a catalog this 1 shows MSRP at 850, figure tax ,Brady etc . and micro town gun shop .

My buddy grew up on "poor side" but knows the value of the buck . He likes to support the little local guy as long as he doesn't need medical attention for the burns . Me I'd have called the guy 70 miles away got the Davidsons deal and walked out with the $280 difference for primers and powder .
On the other hand the little local has had some 22 on hand at below market rate for locals for the last 5 yr so there might be something to it.
 
L

Lost Dog

Guest
My view on the Henry rifles are very simple. Yes, they're built solid. Smooth actions. Great customer service. But they ARE NOT your traditional Winchester or Marlin. I honestly believe that folks see "lever action " and think 1800's yet see a Henry built to look sorta old style, But designed with today's modern features. Strong. Accurate. But not your grandpa's model 92 or 94. Not a bad gun by any means. Just ain't traditional.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
Yes that looks like it .

Lost
I don't think the Savage 99 or BLR are terribly traditional either but I sure wouldn't kick 1 to the curb .
None of these guns are really traditional if they were we wouldn't have the 45 Colts or 357s we'd have 38-40s and 44 Russians and even the 44 Henry would be a rim fire . The spirit is all that's left and that is what we have in the Henry line . Who's bright idea was it to mess with the A5 ?

I read some place about all of the S&W MIM parts and how close they are on the CNC frames . Someone made an observation about the dollar value against a 1950 Winchester M70 vs a brand new FN Winchester M70 and in a shocking conversion they come out within $100.


I refigured my ammo cost for hand loads and cast bullets the power consumption was figured long but I'm up to 14.50 / 100 for Colts of course the above ammo goes for 37/ box .

I guess the thing is that we complain about how much it costs for a decent gun , but in 69 a Chrysler New Port was $3200 off the lot and a set of better truck tires costs half that now . An original Model T was $ 825 whether you bought it assembled or 1 piece at a time but the spare tire and wheel were extra , Uncle paid $12 a copy for 1917 and 1911s a bare bones pick up if you can find such a beast is 22k and goes on up to 55. That T was 67x what the 1917 was, funny how a new truck with premium equipment(the T was premium ) tips in at nearly the same price rate , a guy posted a link to a 45 Colts/moon clip ACP this morning at 1049 .

At the end there's no skilled labor involved, designs are simplified and a better grade costs what it always has .
 

quicksylver

Well-Known Member
Lost....thanks for the smile.

What got me smiling was trying to figure out if a 18-20 yr old got a Winchester Angle eject when they first came out could he be a grandpa by now? :)
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
Lost....thanks for the smile.

What got me smiling was trying to figure out if a 18-20 yr old got a Winchester Angle eject when they first came out could he be a grandpa by now? :)
I remember some hoopla about the angle eject ,I was maybe 16 in 82 now I'm a grandpa to 7 so that is a resonating yes . My own kids are 31,29,27 and 26 with 5 steps down to 17. The oldest grand is a blood step at 13 down to 4 months. Funny 13,8,7,6,3,2 and months the youngest boy is responsible for the 6-8 yo and had orders for Iraq 4 months after the oldest came , and shipped out to Afghanistan when the 6 yo was about the same age .
 

Cherokee

Medina, Ohio
I can't warm up to Henry's. I simply do not like the tube feed, no half-cock and every time I see someone shooting one at SASS, it has function problems.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
that tube feed is what keeps me from getting one.
I see them everywhere but just can't do it.
I can't buy a taurossi, and even though I have seen some nice looking marlins recently I can't buy one made by Remington.

I do want a 41 mag lever gun, and a 24" model 92 rifle in 357.
those 2 would settle down the lever gun needs for quite a while.
 

Josh

Well-Known Member
I will own a Henry levergun when the 41 Mag becomes available, no need for any other IMO
 

Cherokee

Medina, Ohio
I have a relatively new Rossi 92 357 20" that shoots great and the action is not bad. I like the gun.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
Being fond of things that cam over in lockstop I prefer my 92' ,but the Rosschesters need tinkering to run well .
 
9

9.3X62AL

Guest
I am kinda "unevolved" as far as lever rifles go. My idea of a 44 caliber lever rifle was a '73 or '92 Winchester in 44/40, but I sucked it up and bought a RiceChester 92 in 44 Magnum and have been so happy with it I'll likely get its little brother in 357 Magnum once they stop being "unobtainium". So it has been with mixed feelings that I regard the Henry products. They seem to be a decent design with updated features not found on traditional leverguns, and a lot of the detractor statements about the rifle line are similar to things said about Bill Ruger and his investment-cast firearm receivers. I think Ruger's designs have made the grade, and I suspect the Henry levercritters will gain greater acceptance over time.
 

quicksylver

Well-Known Member
I like the real thing......spend $1,200.00 shoot it, sell it for $1,250.00...
Maybe you don't get to have as many guns at once but you get to save money...
But this is a sport of the heart not the mind...I understand...
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
if it weren't I wouldn't have a browning a Winchester and a Rossi all in 44 mag.
I shoot the Rossi the most.
I'd shoot the browning more but it is tooo damn picky about oal and I have to make jacketed bullets for it or single feed it.
the Winchester needs either jacketed or 433 diameter.
it's easier to just give them the home made jacketed bullets than fiddle with cast for them.