Holster Adventures

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Last night, I started examining my several holsters I use for hauling around my war toys when going in harm's way. Those generally are in good shape, and some have been recently re-conditioned. As a part of this, I took out several of the carry guns--clearing them--and confirming their fit in the reworked rigs. The P-220, the P-226, the Glock 23, the 686 x 4", and the CZ-75B all got checked through. Maybe I'm just getting old and decrepit, but that CZ-75 is A HEFTY CHUNK OF IRON, compared to the alloy- and plastic-framed SIGs and Glock. The 686.....well, it too is a chunk--but that's expected. It has been a while since I hauled the CZ around much, so I elected last night to bump it up into the carry rotation for a while. I'm sure it was feeling neglected. I hauled it around today in a shoulder rig under a loose casual shirt, and a good holster can really make that heft seem to disappear.

Shoulder rigs were never very popular at my shop. I never understood that--they were ESPECIALLY handy when working from a car, since a belt holster was awkward as hell to draw from in a hurry while seated. For much of my career, I practically lived in a sedan or SUV. A shoulder rig allows discreet carry of full-sized or mid-sized autopistols and revolvers, instead of sub-compacts or snubbies that are limited in capacity and sight radius. Larger folks like me have trouble with the dinky grips on some of those tiny blasters.

It felt good to have that high-cap 40 S&W along at brunch today. The restaurant my old partners and I meet at on Tuesdays is in a neighborhood with its share of issues--largely hand-to-hand dope deals on an adjacent property. Given that police are currently unmotivated to disrupt such retailing, the perps conducting it feel empowered and emboldened to some degree, and may extend their depredations into other venues in this newly-expanded venture environment. One should always be ready for such developments.
 
Last edited:

Rick H

Well-Known Member
When I worked plainclothes, and not stuck in the office, I carried a full sized 1911 Colt Government model in a Jackass shoulder rig.
It was comfortable for up to 12 hrs. at a time.
I wasn't a big guy, 6' 180#. The piece concealed well under a sport coat or light jacket. I like the shoulder rig.

Funny how my duty gunbelts seem to have shrunk over the years. :confused:
 
Last edited:

Missionary

Well-Known Member
Shrinking is the real issue with leather !
I like a shoulder rig for 1911's and our P9 in 40S&W or a full size revolver. I like Hip-Grips on revolvers with 3 inch or less barrels.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
Shoulder rigs have their place but I've never been a fan of them.

In some situations, like seated in vehicles, they have some positive attributes. However, when up close and personal with your adversary - they have some distinct drawbacks.

YMMV
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
No doubt about it, P&P. Every element of carrying a sidearm is a trade-off between portability, concealability, and projectible power. If I knew/know ahead of time that trouble is likely, I grab The Gauge or a rifle.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
I agree, every type of holster is some type of compromise. The constant balance between security, speed and comfort is never a perfect balance.
I always come down a little more on weapon retention and a little less on speed (accessibility). That's a personal preference and not holy writ.