Little Lady's CC pistol?

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
They are all variations on the Star, but the different makers do different details. The Colts had 1911 style tunnel extractors (like early
BHPs), as did the early Sig P238s, and the current Kimber. But later Sigs, and the Springfield have an external extractor. I never pulled down
a Colt Govt Model .380, so from Allen's info, they retained the 1911 link, while some of the others have a captured slot/cam system like many later
designs of handguns which are basically JMB dropping barrel designs. Lots of similarities to the 1911 design, but the trigger area is
a lot different. But, the locked breech is a far more important deal than many appreciate. Essentially all the older generation of
.380s are straight blowback, and this increases recoil tremendously. Compare a Colt Gov't Model .380 to a Walther PPK, side by side
and the recoil difference is amazing.
The locked and cocked nature of the design appeals to me, but many folks are not comfortable with that concept. But it does
permit a lighter and shorter trigger pull than most other designs, although individual examples vary a lot.

A note for freebullet's wife - my wife uses a clip on Sneaky Pete holster, which looks like some sort of a largish phone case or
something. Nice leather, magnetic flap, and while obviously something, it does not look like a gun or holster. Never gets
a second glance. My wife doesn't like wearing belts, or having anything significant in a pocket, and never has carried a purse,
just not her style and she was not going to change. We struggled with various designs, mostly she hated them and wouldn't use
them, until we got the Sneaky Pete.
Sneaky Pete.jpg

Holster types are an extremely individualized thing, depends on body type, normal clothing worn and lifestyle choices.

Good luck. on finding the gun AND holster to meet your wife's requirements.
The Llama small .22 and .380 mini1911 are more like a real 1911 inside, but are blowback and shoddy materials and internal
fit and finish is quite poor, clearly many small parts were literally made with a file out of soft steel. I have a Llama
.22 cal mini-1911 and it is PITA keeping it running. :confused: But it looks and works like a 1911, will fit small hands and I am
saving it for a training device for grand nieces and nephews - if I can keep it working.


Bill
 
Last edited:

Winelover

North Central Arkansas
IMO, the Sneaky Pete, should do away with their Logo........... on the outside of the holster. It shouts out gun.
 

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
Hmmm. I don;t quite get how a stylized S joined to a P "shouts out gun"?? And too small to actually tell what it
is from more than 4 ft away, anyway. Seems pretty benign to me. Plus there are nylon versions in various colors,
some with medical symbols, I guess like a EMT's pack or something.



Sneaky Pete logo.jpg
Or distressed leather, exterior pockets and a impressed eagle.

Sneaky Pete distressed.jpg

And the "looks like something else" nylon versions.

Sneaky Pete covert.jpg

Depends on your clothing and lifestyle.

Bill
 
Last edited:

Missionary

Well-Known Member
Those little pouches are nice.
My wife has a 5 shot S&W half titanium and Scanadium (?) in .357 magnum. But we load 357 brass down to sensible 38 Special thumping.
The State police officer that bought it new fired two cylinders full and took it back to the saleman and said sell that little monster. I came it 2 hours later to see if there were any used revolvers laying about and happily plopped down $350.
Yep my wife has done taken over my good deal.
 
Last edited:

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Thematic variation on the mall-walker bag holsters of the 80s. I would not be keen on the clip-mount versions, the belt loop variants would be my preference--but folks live and work in different environments than my own. Clip mounting might be just what the doctor ordered for someone else.

Missionary--wives DO hijack firearms from time to time. Marie took ownership of a SIG P-228 I dragged home in 2003 without a moment's hesitation. I had to distract her with my Mini-14 when she started making similar acquisitive noises about the 2012-built AR-15 A2 variant I put together--"I used this in the Army!" I know a red flag when I see or hear one.
 
Last edited:

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
Only to serious gun guys, Ian. None of the average people notice at all, believe me. Yeah, big fanny packs, sure.
I wear a untucked shirt in the summer, various kinds of cotton, short sleeved, sometimes with a Tshirt under
and unbuttoned in cooler weather, no T-shirt in warmer weather.

I think a Sneaky Pete for anything larger than the smallest semiautos will be a bit too big and too odd. My
wife's is just a little bit larger than an older phone case. They make them for various smallish Glocks and I
can't see that working.

And "in CCW states...." now about 40+ of the states, pretty much anywhere outside of Cali and the NE
states, north of VA, with a few exceptions (VT, NH, ME). Even Illinois has Shall Issue CCW nowdays, but
recognizes no out of state licenses, like Oregon.

Bill
 
Last edited:

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Anything like a cell phone case may be a target for thief!

This is the basis for my "Belt-loop vs. clip-on" idea mentioned above. Sure--a stalwart pull might still tear the package loose--but more likely the carrier will get pulled off balance, and a nasty old man like me will see to it that I land with all 250# of my svelte 6'2" frame on his/her solar plexus or similar fragile body part. Not the first wrasslin' match I've been in over a sidearm.

Dressing around a CCW is a complex question, esp. in areas like mine where sidearms are not a fixture in peoples' minds. Nevada is heaven--the whole darn state is CCW except places like Reno and Lost Wages that are filled with tourists shoving their money into gaming devices. Once out of the Coastal Corridor (CA, OR, WA) the 2nd Amendment is taken at face value, and folks like being armed because there REALLY are not cops placed at every intersection like Boston and NYC feature. If Something Bad takes place, it's on YOU to resolve it. I don't mind that at all. WITHOUT DOUBT, my most treasured asset in retirement is my CCW Permit, and it goes nationwide (with some limits) via HR 218. In 14 years of retirement, there have been a couple times that I was VERY happy to have been "heeled". It is a dangerous world, and our country treats criminal justice like fish & game wardens treat black bass fisheries--where it's all about catch & release. Thankfully, most states have embraced citizen CCW as a cost-effective check against rampant criminal activities. And if CA authorities think the decent citizens AREN'T carting around sidearms without benefit of .gov blessings, GUESS AGAIN, Charlie Brown.
 
Last edited:

Pistolero

Well-Known Member
I agree about the clip on, but since she will not wear a belt, the choice is this or nothing. She is aware of the
risk. And as to CCW in general, my licenses are good in almost all states outside of the NE corridor no-go zone
and Cali/Oregon. Could be better but pretty darned good, IMO.

Bill
 
Last edited:

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
There is an extremely un-American flavor to states and locales that restrict decent folks from carrying the means to defend life and safety. There are snakes in the grass, bears in the woods, and hairballs in numbers at large in our world. Going armed is a logical response to these conditions. As I have said here and elsewhere more than once--I could have retired a lot sooner if I had ten dollars for every Chief's Special or PPK/S that I ignored enthusiastically on car stops during my patrol years.