Heat treating and alloying-up are two slightly different things. Heat treated alloy will always draw and flow like it will when air cooled, its just stronger. Add more antimony and possibly tin and the heat treating characteristics change slightly, but the draw is affected at all tempers. Tin is in effect a grain refiner and a small amount of it (up to equal the antimony content by molarity) will make a very fine Sb/Sn matrix which is stronger than no-tin antimony alloy and doesn't flow very easily at all, at any temper. The minimum bhn will be higher but max bhn lower than no-tin when heat treated. Sometimes you want an alloy that's tough but draws easily (as when using the rifle to size the bullet) and sometimes you want a naturally finer, slicker, springier metal that's pre-fit very closely to the throat dimensions and doesn't change shape very much when fired.
Fiver is one of the few people who has made two-diameter bullets work at hv (me not being one of them) and he has done this by bumping up the tin and antimony of ww to about #2 alloy and adjusting casting temperatures to make noses which perfectly engrave and bands which get scuffed all the way into the throat. If the bullets have too much antimony they can't flex enough to handle the bumping at hv and also micro-fracture and slough metal off on the drive side of the lands causing leaks and poor accuracy. Its all a balance. Try the alloy he recommended for the Lees and size them to throat entrance diameter so the front band edge parks itself into the center of the throat funnel when chambered. I think ww alloy is just too weak for max velocity in the .22s unless you powder coat them. Pc 50/50 alloy didn't work too well for me in the .22s and I tried both the Lee and MP .22 NATO bullet both, but same alloy was plenty for .30-caliber even air cooled at 2400 fps. Air-cooled pc alloy held up fine to over 2900 fps. in the .22. At lower velocities (2k fps) ww alloy might work in the .22.