New moulds!

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
I recieved a shipment from Arsenal moulds this evening. Transatlantic shipping is not cheap, so I tend to buy more than one mould when I occationally place an order. This time, I bought 3 4-cav moulds.

The 311-176-LFN is a mould design heavily inspired by the Ranch Dog-designs. I have a 2-cav NOE311-166 GC mould already. That’s the one with the stepped nose; it works very well in my Marlin 30/30 MG. I wanted a PB mould with the conical nose. I liked the look of the «beefy» base band of the version with tumble lube grooves. I asked for a .310 mould with WW alloy. My alloy typically casts +0.001in, relative to nominal diameter. I did some quick-and-dirty casting this evening, to start break-in. The bullet was .311, weighing 175grs.
This will be used both as regular PB, PC and with plain-base GC

F3DD6A95-3AD4-476F-88BA-2088CCB854C2.jpeg


I’ve yet to find a really light weight .30-cal plinking bullet with good accuracy. I thought this one might be worth a try; another «Ranch dog-esque» design, the 313-115- RF. Again, I asked for a .310, and it was right on .311 in my alloy, as expected. I think it has a promising nose shape, for such a light bullet. Hopefully, it will be a nice plinking bullet. The nose shape also show obvious potential as a small- game whacker with moderate loads

799E94AA-6912-43D1-B286-00E93C5B6574.jpeg


And last, but not least: my first groove-less bullet. It even has a bevel base :eek:
The closest I’ve got to a slick bullet is the Arsenal HVTH1, which is one of my favourites.
This is the 225-45, I ordered .224. This will be powder coat, only.
I’m curious how it’ll work out. This mould has very few sharp angles to fill. It should be easier to get a optimally balanced bullet. Maybe cull rates will be so low, I can skip the tedious bullet sorting/inspection for recreational ammo. The bevel base provides some refuge for metal displaced by sizing, or engraving. It looks like..... a bullet!
This will be exciting!

4988405F-F5C8-4BF5-B2A7-32C6D7543EAA.jpeg

Edit: corrected erroneous spelling
 
Last edited:

Bret4207

At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
That little 30 call resembles the Lyman 311316, one of the easiest to use bullets I've ever run across. It's worked in literally everything I've ever tried it in that wasn't jacket fouled to start with. You should have fun with that one!
 

Glaciers

Alaska Land of the Midnight Sun
Picked up the same 311-176 LFN couple months ago just started breaking it in yesterday. Mines a 5 cavity, 3 gas check and 2 plain base. I suspect you will be shooting those 176's before me as I've got others ahead in the line. But keep us updated with your progress.
 

Jeff H

NW Ohio
@Spindrift , you are tempting me.

I have the third/final version of the Ranch Dog 165 grain bullet - gas -checked. It shoots marvelously in my 30-30 Contender Carbine, but I mostly shoot it at about 1200 fps with 7.5 grains of Unique. It's a 6C and having five of those plain-based would be really convenient, but I could buy another Arsenal mould for what it would cost to convert that one. At under a hundred bucks, shipped for an Arsenal 4C, I could have a 1GC/3FB made up, Dang it!

I also recently got the plain-based 358-158 that looks like your smaller 30 cal bullet you just got, but have not had a chance to test it in the carbine. I really like the basic design and I love his moulds.

I think we enjoy someone else's new moulds as much as getting new moulds ourselves. ;)
 

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
Thanks, @Jeff H !

Arsenal moulds make nice moulds, and I particularily appreciate the fact that you can specify the dimensions you want. And at a fair price, too.

These .30-cal moulds were made to drop .310 (+0.001 positive tolerance), which means I can shoot them unsized, with tumble lube. Or powder coat them, without pre-sizing them. Just coat them as-cast, and size to final diameter after coating. Larger PB bullets tend to make «skirts» at the base if I don’t pre-size.

I appreciate the reduced work loads of PB bullets. Adding either a plain-base GC, or PC, allows me to extend the range of useful loads into the 16-1800fps neighborhood. This covers most of my needs.

I just coated some survivors from the mould break-in. These are not sized, yet. They are coated with a mix of three different colors, hence the slightly mottled appearance (one powder with good adhesive properties, and two who didn’t work well on their own- 3:1:1).

64A12EB6-3B16-4B66-85FC-E2E35F7E2617.jpeg
046D4810-8626-469F-A2A4-C2108112B65D.jpeg
 

Ian

Notorious member
Anxiously awaiting a range report on that little .22......

I predict the other two will bore you in short order with steady tight groups if only you size about .001" over groove diameter, give them no more than .002" neck tension, and seat them to just barely touch the origin of the rifling.
 

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t mind boringly predictable accuracy, I’ll keep you posted!

That slick .225-45 excites me too. What I’ve learned so far is, the slick side of the bullet is extremely revealing to any kind of defect or flow lines. And that the required casting pace makes this 4-cavity mould very productive.

I have some bullets coated and ready now, I just have to give them a couple of weeks for the alloy to settle a little.