RCBS 148-DE-WC

waco

Springfield, Oregon
This is a two cavity mold. These are sized to .358” and PC jet black and will be loaded with 2.7gr BE and shot in my S&W 14-2F0A977FF-1E82-4216-A7C1-BDEB1987E5D3.jpeg
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
Question for you guys using PC.

Are you sizing after coating and baking? Are you using lube in any loads?

I noticed a couple photos by Ian that wpshowed lube but they were for a rifle.

Years back I had a guy PC some bullets for me and he used a gloss and a matte powder. The gloss was far easier to size than the matte.
 

Ian

Notorious member
I only put lube on screamers. Bama is shooting no-groove, no-lube .30 calibers to full copper jax velocities, but he does get a little fouling that must be cleaned every 20 rounds or so IIRC. I don't shoot much in the 1000-2000 fps range, mostly below or above, and I've tried with and without lube with varying results. Generally I lube if I'm installing a check, though for my .35 Remington I check them and size dry before coating, then lube in the same die afterward. Lube does increase velocity some so I have to think it's sealing better or adding some resistance.

For what Waco's doing there, I couldn't think of a better use for PC. No lube, just load and shoot. Size only after coating for two reasons: Smoother finish on the bands and the PC makes them slip through the sizer with no wear and no lube that you would have to remove before coating.
 

waco

Springfield, Oregon
Ian is right. PC size to .358” load and shoot. This is my method for all pistol stuff. I don’t mess around with PC in rifle stuff too much. Messes with the nose. I would have to nose size.
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
I can see the benefits for handgun use. Keeping the lube grunge out of the action of an auto would be a big benefit. I like the HT for that reason.
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
Think of it as a BLL like coating that needs to be baked.
It goes on in a pretty thin and even coating.

Advantage over PC is less fiddly as the bullets can bake laying down with no trouble. It also forms a far thinner coating so less fit issues.

Disadvantage is need for 2 or more costs. It is probably a bit more expensive but I can coat 20K bullets for 75 bucks so cost isn't really an issue.
 

Ian

Notorious member
Messes with the nose. I would have to nose size.

If PC messes with your nose size you should look at a different rifle bullet. Either one of the Arsenal ones like Bama uses or a self-aligning tapered bullet like the AM 31-188G. Tapered bullets only need to be seated a couple thousandths deeper if coated.
 

358156 hp

At large, whereabouts unknown.
That particular RCBS mould is one of my favorites. I had a pair of them that I used a lot during my wadcutter addiction days. I sold them all off, and thought I was cured, but I had a relapse. Now I have an Ideal 358063 4 cav. DE wadcutter mould, an Ideal 358432 DC, and (of all things) a Modern Bond 358610 2 cavity that I bought because it looked like it accepted a gas check. It turned out not to be a GC design, but it does have a rebate at the nose with what appears to be a "DD" band. I politely listened to an old-timer rattle on about a bore riding wadcutter design long ago, and now I wonder if this is what he was trying to explain to me. A "DD" band is a small band cut into the nose of a mould to help keep the nose centered in the bore as the bullet enters the rifling. I've seen them on rifle moulds, but never on a wadcutter of all things. So far, I have been powdercoating my wadcutters too, primarily with Smokes "Carolina Blue", and I tend to push them a bit faster than most guys load their wadcutters, generally at full power 38 Spl velocities, or even at +P in some cases.
 

USSR

Finger Lakes Region of NY
I'm more of a traditionalist. I use a very low antimony and relatively high tin alloy, and just lube them in the lower lube groove.

Don

Mp-molds 359-395HBWC_1.jpg