Remington quality

Ole_270

Well-Known Member
I'm not all that big a fan of the 243, mostly because of the muzzle blast and heavy throat erosion. That said, the three biggest bucks I've ever seen were killed with 243s. Mine was the smallest at 175 gross B&C, taken at 150 yards. The biggest was my cousins, taken at over 300 yards and a mile south of me. My Brother in Law could of used a spear on his, was sitting with his back to a grown up fence row when he heard shots half a mile behind him. Got a look back there to see the monster running his way. Took the shot essentially straight up as the buck jumped the fence.
I haven't use my 243 much the last few years, mostly the 250 Savage and 257 Roberts.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
I used to shoot with a friend that had an old pre-64 Winchester Model 70 chambered in 243. He is an outstanding marksman and he could best me on skill alone but I was also impressed with the cartridge. If there was any throat erosion in that rifle after all the years, it certainly didn't affect the accuracy.
That 6mm bullet has its place. It brings a little more weight to the target but is still light enough for some impressive velocity. In Virginia the 243 meets the minimum caliber requirements for deer hunting, this makes it a popular cartridge for young hunters. A lot of people start with that cartridge and stay with it because, frankly - it works !
I've always felt the 6mm projectiles had a little more going for them in terms of ballistics than the 5.56mm. The military's adoption of the 5.56 guaranteed widespread acceptance of the 223; but what would have happened if the AR-15 had been built around a 6mm projectile?
Oh well, we'll never know.....
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
the 6mm creedmore might change some of that.
it seems anything that isn't old is better than the old one, even if it ain't as good.
 

todd

Well-Known Member
I'm not all that big a fan of the 243, mostly because of the muzzle blast and heavy throat erosion. That said, the three biggest bucks I've ever seen were killed with 243s. Mine was the smallest at 175 gross B&C, taken at 150 yards. The biggest was my cousins, taken at over 300 yards and a mile south of me. My Brother in Law could of used a spear on his, was sitting with his back to a grown up fence row when he heard shots half a mile behind him. Got a look back there to see the monster running his way. Took the shot essentially straight up as the buck jumped the fence.
I haven't use my 243 much the last few years, mostly the 250 Savage and 257 Roberts.

i ain't either. the big bucks i have seen have been killed with the '06 or the 270. i have killed deer with the 25-06 but i think that its overbore. my project rifle is a 93 spanish mauser in 257 roberts, when i have the time to do it. when asked, what would be the caliber to give to my young son/daughter? i would say either the 7-08(factory loads) or the 7x57 mauser(handloads). well, i give that answer if you are young, old or middle aged. i've had the 6.5 creedmoor and i like it, i would say the 6.5 cm too.

back when i was young(14with wim m94 in 30-30. or so years old and up), me and my friend would go groundhog hunting. he was with his rem m788 with a 6x scope in 243 and i with a win m94(1972) with open sights in 30-30. i learned how shoot with it out to 200 yards. he, on the other hand, made some amazing shots. he took it out deer hunting and every shoot he took was a head shot. he finally gave up head shooting when he missed the deer's brain and was shot in the jaw. for 3 days he hunted the jaw stricking deer, when his uncle finally killed it. they took it home and skun the body to find that its spine was infected(pus). he called the game commision up and they took his deer and gave him another tag. he didn't shoot a deer till next year. he uses a win m70 in 270 and he lung shoots deer. i have tracked 6 or 7 deer(unfortunately, i never caught up with the deer) that weren't mine, that were shot with the 243. in every case, they were shot by a young boy(never a girl.....hmmm, i wonder why doesn't buck fever affect girls?). well anyway, the 7mm caliber (could be a 6.5mm) with 140gr bullets are good for deer. the .244" and the .257" are left to a guy/girl that knows a deer's anatomy and can shoot. this is just my $.02, your $.02 could be different than mine and thats ok.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
I think the 25 is some over bore too, but I gave up worrying about it.
I even started using it for some rock chuck hunting, figuring if I wore the barrel out I'd just buy another one.
if I managed to put 20-25 rounds a year through it I'd have to shoot it for another 50 years before I seen enough wear to worry about it.