38spl hbwc thoughts?

Bazoo

Active Member
Heck SWCs are not speedloader friendly either. Truncated or RF would be the way to go there.
 

StrawHat

Well-Known Member
Are wadcutters the easiest bullet to charge a cylinder? No. That would be a round nose bullet. But, thousands of PPC competitors learned how to reload with wadcutters effectively and speedily.

Or, WC for the first cylinder and whatever is your choice for the reload.

Many ways to get to the finish line, choose the one that works best for you!

Kevin
 

Reeferman

New Member
A good way to ring your barrel!
Yup I did that to my 14-3 with 8 inch barrel. Made a mistake and had powder measure set for Lee trashcan wad cutter when loading some Campro copper plated HBWC. It only took 2 grains more of Bullseye and happened after second shot.
 

Bazoo

Active Member
I classify them like this.
RF or TC ammo in speedloaders for revolver = "Just fall in"
SWC ammo in speedloaders for revolver = "wiggle it and they fall in"
WC ammo in speedloaders for revolver = "get out the damn reading glasses to align them MFers"

:rofl:
LOL, yep.
 

Outpost75

Active Member
Why is it critical that self defense rounds work with a speed loader ?

So that the round bulge of that speed loader in your pocket gives fair warning to the steeple that you are "armed and ready."

You sure wouldn't want to carry a flat, easily concealed Tuff Strip or spare mag for a compact, single-stack autopistol in your pocket because doing so is "evil and sneaky!"

:cool:
 
Last edited:

Matt_G

Curmudgeon in training
Avoiding the need for wc cases and wanting +p loads
As an aside here...Starline 38 Special brass IS wadcutter brass.
From the mouth to about half way to the web it is straight sided and right at .010 thick

At least the two boxes I have bought are that way.
That doesn't mean it's ALWAYS that way though.
You need to check it.
 

Bret4207

At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
Here, let me throw another stick on the fire. I have never, ever understood the theory that a wad cutter MUST be loaded so the case mouth and face of the bullet are at the same depth. I've loaded a lot of WC's out a good long ways and they were just as, if not more accurate than the traditional method.

Any thoughts?
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
Here, let me throw another stick on the fire. I have never, ever understood the theory that a wad cutter MUST be loaded so the case mouth and face of the bullet are at the same depth. I've loaded a lot of WC's out a good long ways and they were just as, if not more accurate than the traditional method.

Any thoughts?
Not much controversy there. The S&W model 52 required flush seated WC’s, so they get a pass. As for revolvers, there are lots of options. I tend to use a type II wadcutter that has a driving band outside the case, like a H&G #50, so nothing shocking there either.