New IMR Powders

Ian

Notorious member
Might be good for someone just starting out. I already have duplicates of every one of those nine in at least two and in some cases three different brands. Of course they aren't "green" or "CFE" or perfectly uniform in bulk from lot to lot as these claim, but somehow I'll manage along without these new ones for the next 20 years or so.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
Kinda how I looked at it, a marketing ploy mostly. Also wonder how many very worthwhile old standby's will go away to make room for the newcomers.
 

Ian

Notorious member
Most of them, probably. I'm having a hard time confirming this but I read somewhere that the "green" part of these new powders has to do with reduced need to wash them in the final processing, so less liquid waste is produced. I'm sure that the reduced cost of the new manufacturing processes will drive out the old powders eventually, but we can figure the manufacturers are going to let us get used to the new ones first.
 

358156 hp

At large, whereabouts unknown.
I'm under the impression that Alliant is having to use a subcontractor to make the original flake powders for them since they lost the government contract to Radford Arsenal. IIRC, BAE won the contract, and Alliant is having them manufacture the powders for resale, and that situation isn't sitting well with Alliants management.
 

uncle jimbo

Well-Known Member
I'm under the impression that Alliant is having to use a subcontractor to make the original flake powders for them since they lost the government contract to Radford Arsenal. IIRC, BAE won the contract, and Alliant is having them manufacture the powders for resale, and that situation isn't sitting well with Alliants management.
I read this also and the article said that these were just knock offs of Alliants red, green, blue, and unique powders. I have never tried them, like the original and I have data for them.
 

Ian

Notorious member
At least we have options. To hear us talk some might think we'd find anything to gripe about. My point of view is cynicism about the whole charade of "green" still directing major production plants, and we the consumer are stuck with the end result, which is NEVER less expensive for US.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
I just got a twitch ......that little voice said get 4 more cans of the standards while you can .........

I'd be in a fix if I couldn't have Unique , H322 and 4350 . I really need to find a shotshells replacement for the discontinued 4756.....maybe Blue Dot or Steel ......no it was better . Cleaner less flash faster loads .
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
they ain't very good knock-offs.
Hodgdon originally said to use the same bushings to get the same amount of powder and same results on the chronograph.
they pulled that info as soon as the powders hit the shelf.
now they say to use the same data. [umm okay]

if the new powders were cheaper I'd consider trying the red or the green but they ain't and I'm not so impressed with titewad.
it burns dirty and it stinks, literally stomach turning stinks. [not acrid like 700-X in shotshell applications]
or maybe the few places I have tried it are just not its happy place.[shrug]

I knew about the change in Alliant powder production.
they announced it back during the crunch, but nobody paid much heed to that happening.
the new operators are doing a good job of keeping the powder quality and bulkiness the same as old lots have been.
and there have been no complaints or questions like there has been about the new clays powders.
 

Ian

Notorious member
I just got a twitch ......that little voice said get 4 more cans of the standards while you can .........

I'd be in a fix if I couldn't have Unique , H322 and 4350 . I really need to find a shotshells replacement for the discontinued 4756.....maybe Blue Dot or Steel ......no it was better . Cleaner less flash faster loads .

Try True Blue where you used to use 4756.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
Thanks I'll check it out .
The 4756 was awesome under an 1 1/16 of 1-B in a 12 ga advertised was 1510 . All I know for sure is it worked , 12# honker beyond 40 yd dropped stone dead and I never bit a bb.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
the 4756 worked in the big long cases too.
I switched to steel for many loads but have to weigh every charge.
I still use 800-X at 1400 fps in the 2-3/4" loads with a sam-1 wad full of 1's or 2's

one other powder I worked with a bit was long shot, it gives some good [1500 type] velocity's with the steel shot wads.
I was putting a felt spacer underneath 1-1/8 oz of number-5 lead and cutting 4 more slits in the steel shot wads.
 

Bret4207

At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
Jeeze I hate change like this. Stick with what works and leave it alone! "NEW!", "IMPROVED!!!" was fine in 1966. These days it just means "MORE EXPENSIVE!", "NOT AS GOOD AS THE OLD STUFF!!!". Of course I'm still using power from the late 70's/early 80's. Guess it's good I don't shoot as much as I used to...
 

Winelover

North Central Arkansas
I'm happy with the old powders and have no reason to change. Took delivery of 8#'s of 2400, yesterday. :) Was having withdrawals....down to three pounds.:eek:
 

Brad

Benevolent Overlord and site owner
Staff member
I can't think of the last time I bought IMR powder. Must have been 20 years ago?
Lots of Hodgdon but mostly Alliant.
 

Winelover

North Central Arkansas
Usually, Alliant or Accurate, for me. However, I did add a pound of IMR 4895 to the order, to try with cast in the 338 Mag.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
I've never tried IMR 4895 but can't possibly remember how many 8 pounders of H-4895 I've burned up.