NOE 309-177-RF-BN6

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
Most of the time, when we powder coat our bullets, we use bullets designed for the use of conventional lubes. The dimensions of the nose is designed with the intention of being used without the added (about) 0,002in of the coat.


And the big picture is, we’re doing fine.

However, there are some issues that might arise from the fact we’re using bullet designs in this «off-label» fashion

1) Chambering issues. This is a particular problem with bore-riders that are well-fitting in the first place. However, it also presents a method to ameliorate the situation with an under-sized bore-rider.

2) Crimping. The shorter COL enforced by the fattened-up nose might render the crimp groove unusable (sometimes remedied by trimming cases to sub-standard length).

3) Base distortion. Particularily with PB bullets of generous as-cast size, you might get skirting at the base if all sizing is done in the nose- first fashion. Sizing base-first before coating might be necessary before coating to avoid this.

4) Loss of sophistication. Sometimes, adding 0,002in and the sizing down can render small tapers or stepped bands cylindrical.

The NOE 309-177 caught my attention, and I tried to find some info on the mould. A Google search yielded nothing. All varieties were in stock. These two observations combined, lead me to the conclusion this mould is probably incredible unpopular. Which might be undeserved?

Let’s take a look at the technical drawing

A8532175-6D52-4FAD-A389-F5032CE687CF.jpeg

On the face of it, this looks like a disaster. But if you add 0,002in to all diameters, it looks a lot better! In fact, it looks like it’s .311 big brother. I don’t know if the .309-177 was designed with PC in mind, or if it is intended for the tight K-31. But it looks quite well-designed for a coat-only bullet.

A8532175-6D52-4FAD-A389-F5032CE687CF.jpeg

With such a wide-meplat bullet, I consider it non-productive to pursue velocities above 2000- 2100fps. And I’ve found coated PB bullets to be capable of good accuracy at these velocities. I got a 2-cav PB mould. I’d rather have a 4-cav, but that was not an available option.
Casting, coating and sizing (post- coat, .310) was unproblematic. The alloy is my nuclear medicine lead with some tin (eye-balled, about 1%?). BHN around 15 after one month of maturation.

C53FA16A-CC4D-42A6-9387-8EFEB58CD93C.jpeg

I’ve started load development in my Howa .308. This is a well-used rifle, factory standard reciever and chamber. The barrel is shortened to 18,5in, and threaded for supressor. It is bedded into a GRS Berserk adjustable stock, and has a Timney trigger and nice scope.

(Photo taken before winter set in)
B4D4D411-8BB7-4803-8191-BF77C52A3456.jpeg


I have previously shot some groups with Norma 200. Groups were OK, despite the fact I got some hang- fires (Norma 200 does not seem to like reduced loads in cold weather). This time, I tried Vectan Tu-3000 which is a single-base extruded powder with a listed burning rate in the «4895»- ballpark.

Ambient temp was 20F, making shooting slightly challenging due to cold fingers. First, I tried 31 grs. The «flier» on the right, is the cold bore shot. Including the flier, 1,1 MOA. I’ll chrony it later.

91B463E7-4AE3-45D0-8B18-273538F18283.jpeg

32 grs resulted in a slightly larger, almost perfect horizontal string

461BD253-9252-483D-B3C0-F0A930F608D8.jpeg

This should be fun! I’ll keep you posted on further developments.
 

Attachments

  • DDD09CA8-6EFB-4EAD-A27F-C137E1A92863.jpeg
    DDD09CA8-6EFB-4EAD-A27F-C137E1A92863.jpeg
    150.9 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:

Tomme boy

Well-Known Member
NOE changed all the names of his bullets a couple of years ago. That may be the reason you can not find anything about this bullets. It looks like one of Ranch dogs designs. Have you gone to the NOE forum and looked? The forum is about dead so if you ask you may never get an answer on there.
 

Dimner

Named Man
I have the 310-178-FN GC version of this bullet. Powder coated, it shoots amazing in my M1 garand. I tried to get it to work in my TR94, but that rifle has no throat. No amount of trimming or seating to the lowest depth would help it.

I'm getting 2200-2300 fps in my M1 garand. It is deadly accurate with the new criterion barrel. I'm pretty sure if I had a scope on the garand, this load would average 1.5moa. The mold throws very consistent bullets. If anyone is interested I can look in my notes for the load data.

I think I also tried it in my type 99 arisaka, but it seemed to like the noe-199-FN better. (A clone of the RCBS 180gr FN).

Next step is to try it in my Tikka when I remove the 308 barrel and put on the 30-06.
 

popper

Well-Known Member
I use a similar bullet, 170gr PB FN PCd does fine from 30/30, 1980 fps. Big base band helps. Didn't try it in the 308 AR10.
 

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
Temps just around freezing today, a bit foggy and some sleet in the air. But no wind!

I shot two groups with the 31,5grs of Tubal-3000 suggested by Ian. The rifle is the same, Howa .308.

The low hit on the left target was a bad pull-off. Still, 1-1,1 MOA with PB bullet at deer-capable power. I'm happy with this, and will consider load development done, with this rifle. But I have a few other rifles to try the bullet in.

IMG_20230113_150703785.jpg
 

Spindrift

Well-Known Member
I've had some luck with combining slightly slow-for-application powders, and PB/PC bullets lately.

I wanted to probe the Norma N-4 powder in the .308 a little, with this bullet. N-4 resembles Norma N-204, which has a listed burn rate similar to 4350. According to Norma, it has a low propotion of surface coating. I've found it to work excellently in slightly reduced pressure rounds.

My guesstimation was, the sweet spot would be around 40-41 grs. So I loaded 5 of each (just a probe, right?).

This morning was a beautiful winter morning. Calm, 16'F, deep snow.

I started with the 40grs load, at 100m. No fouler.

After 4 shots, I could see the target, looking like this

IMG_20230128_191647099.jpg

"Oh, man! Don't mess this up! It could be your best cast bullet group ever"

"Bang"

IMG_20230128_191651380_MP.jpg

Ok, the last shot was not what I was hoping for. But still, 1,1 MOA group - not bad at all.

41 grs produced a slightly bigger overall group, 1,2 MOA.
IMG_20230128_191706236.jpg

I'm curious what kind of groups these loads can make in more shooter- friendly weather. You know, when you can shoot without winter gloves.

This bullet and rifle seems like a winning combo!