The Ruger DA Six Series

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
Wow, where to start? The Ruger DA Six series revolvers (Security-Six, Service-Six & Speed-Six) hold a special place in the world of DA revolvers. They were game changers in terms of manufacturing methods, design, and value. I think every Ruger fan felt a twinge of sadness when they were discontinued.

The often-quoted phrase of, “The size of a K-frame with the strength of a L-frame” just about sums up the type. It is that strength that endears the DA -Six’s to their owners. The cast steel frame made without removable side plates is part of that strength. The overall use of beefier components in the lockwork adds strength. The materials used are excellent. Everything about the design is geared towards durability. William Ruger had capitalized on the advantages of cast steel in prior projects, and he applied that manufacturing process to the DA revolver type in the early 1970’s. The result was a line of DA revolvers that combined high strength materials, a high strength design and a low manufacturing cost. It was a winning formula and between 1972 and 1988, over 1.4 million DA-Six series revolvers were produced.

Ruger’s primary competitors in the DA revolver field were S&W and Colt.

Ruger was attempting to take market share away from the old guard. The biggest challenge for S&W and Colt was their manufacturing processes were more costly. Ruger could inexpensively cast a part that was very close to its final form and finish it with a minimal amount of machining. Of course, S&W and Colt fought back. Advertising was filled with accusations and insinuations. S&W would claim that cast parts were weaker (50 years later, clearly that is not true). S&W claimed that Ruger had to use thicker parts because of the cast steel. (Which is a twisted way of saying Ruger Chose to use thicker steel because they could for the same cost). All is fair in love and war, and marketing is war.

Ruger never pushed S&W off the top of the hill, but they did gain market share. Ruger won some law enforcement contracts, they gained ground in civilian sales, they got some overseas contracts. Ruger earned loyal customers.

There were more variations of the Ruger DA Six series than I could possibly identify but the series was divided into three major groups: Security-Six, Service-Six and Speed-Six.

The Security-Six was a square butt frame with adjustable sights. The Service-Six (Sometimes labeled the Police Service-Six) was a square butt frame with fixed sights. And the Speed-Six was a round butt frame with fixed sights. All models were available in carbon steel or stainless steel. They were chambered in 38 Special, 357 magnum, 9mm Luger and 38/200. Most of the guns sold in the U.S.A. were chambered in either 38 Special or 357 Magnum.

Smith & Wesson introduced the L-frames in 1980 and Ruger introduced the GP-100 in 1985. The last of the DA Six series guns were made in 1988 and that was the end of an era.
 

CWLONGSHOT

Well-Known Member
I liked them. I have owned a Speed SIX 357 mag 2 3/4" gun. It was a good shooter.
Had opportunity for a 9mm in same gun and did not buy.

CW
 
Last edited:

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
An acquaintance had one of the postal service Speed-Six revolvers. It had that grey frosted finish and a 3" barrel (as opposed to the normal 2 3/4" barrel frequently seen on the Speed-Six). I suspect it had been shot a lot because the DA pull was smooth as silk.
Cool gun, Nothing fancy, just a solid dependable revolver.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
The Ruger "Six" series revolvers were authorized for carry when I started at my shop, but were deleted in 1987 when autopistols got added to our lineup. That is how things stayed until I retired in 2005. At some point after my departure, someone in our training staff noticed that Colt revolvers were out-of-print and had been for some time, so Ruger 38/357 D/As were reinstated.

I have yet to own a Ruger D/A 38 or 357 revolver. The "Six" series revolvers make a lot of sense, given their "Size of a K-frame/strength of an L-frame" construction. Speed loaders and aftermarket grips were quite scarce for the Sixes compared to S&W and Colt, though I made HKS #10-A loaders work Ok in a 4" Security Six carried by one of the deputies in Indio, after he swore up and down that they didn't work. That guy was a bit different, and left for greener pastures eventually.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
I was always a fan of the S&W Model 13, but would have preferred a Speed Six DAO w 3" barrel. I could just never find one when I could afford it!
Those two guns, the 2.75" Ruger Speed-Six and the 3" S&W Model 13 are direct competitors. They are also both great guns!
DSCN0091.JPG
A 3" S&W Model 65 (basically a stainless steel Model 13) on the left and a 2 3/4" Speed-Six on the right.
 
Last edited:

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
The Ruger "Six" series revolvers were authorized for carry when I started at my shop, but were deleted in 1987 when autopistols got added to our lineup. That is how things stayed until I retired in 2005. At some point after my departure, someone in our training staff noticed that Colt revolvers were out-of-print and had been for some time, so Ruger 38/357 D/As were reinstated.

I have yet to own a Ruger D/A 38 or 357 revolver. The "Six" series revolvers make a lot of sense, given their "Size of a K-frame/strength of an L-frame" construction. Speed loaders and aftermarket grips were quite scarce for the Sixes compared to S&W and Colt, though I made HKS #10-A loaders work Ok in a 4" Security Six carried by one of the deputies in Indio, after he swore up and down that they didn't work. That guy was a bit different, and left for greener pastures eventually.
Speedloaders are whole different conversation, but I will say that Safariland makes a dedicated speedloader for the Ruger DA six series.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Safariland made good loaders, but they were prone to dust and sand sensitivity--and blowing sand was a feature of living in the Low Desert during the 1970s and 1980s. The simpler HKS loaders were more easily cleaned and cleared by running hot tap water through them after being "sanded".

More recently, blow-sand has become less of a PITA, because much of the sand dune area has been developed/paved/concreted into submission. Windshields and paint jobs are much safer these days, but sand damage is still a thing from time to time. Handguns--both rollers and sliders--are surprisingly resistant to sand & grit stoppages. Very light lubrication on moving parts, and none on the exposed surfaces goes a long way toward keeping things running.
 
Last edited:

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
I have found Safariland speedloaders to be extremely reliable and durable, but I don't operate in a desert environment.

HKS offers more choices than Safariland, but Safariland does offer a specific model for the Ruger DA Six series. The Safariland loader for the Ruger DA Six's is marked on the "star" as " R 4 C" and is slightly different than their model made for the S&W Model 10 family of K-frames.

The HKS loaders are certainly simple, proven and inexpensive. The Safariland models are little more money (but not much) but they offer slightly better ergonomics. They are simple "push to release".
 

John

Active Member
I took an estate to the local gun show last month and came home with a lot of cash and a 4" security six. It locks up tighter than a bank vault, has great bluing and shoots well. What's not to like?
 

Winelover

North Central Arkansas
Friend and FFL holder had a SS short barreled Speed-Six, chambered in 357 Magnum. I had the chance to shoot it. What I remember was that it was very heavy but had the best fixed sights of any snubbie I ever was exposed too.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
Ruger always used a blued steel front sight on their fixed sight models. That black front sight is a lot easier to pick up than the "stainless steel on stainless steel" combination sometimes used by other manufacturers.
The cut in the top strap for the rear notch used by Ruger had a square bottom that extended all the way into the slot for the hammer. That may seem like a small difference, but it prevents having that little patch of reflective stainless steel directly below the rear sight.
Little things matter.
 
Last edited:

CWLONGSHOT

Well-Known Member
I have and use more than a half dozen SafariLand holsters. I would hesitate a second to buy another would they be available in a style I wanted. Id give same advice to anyone looking. Thy have been a good investment that never let me down.
 

Creeker

Well-Known Member
Had a 6" Security-Six. They are a nice sixgun but after shooting the S&W K & N Frames for so many years I couldn't live with the action & sent it down the road. It is a personal thing I know & I'm not bad mouthing the Ruger.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
I though the 6" Sec 6 had a decent trigger too . Then I shot a 47' M10 that hadn't shot or carried much .....then I got and early N frame , wow . The Ruger wasn't really all that bad but next to the 1918 built 1917 it was 5 miles of of gravel washboards .

Ever shot a low miles Model 14 Rem ? There's the definition of long gravely triggers .
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
Whenever the discussion involves Ruger DA revolvers, the quality of the trigger pull will come up. I guess it’s inevitable. Trigger pull weight can be measured but how a trigger feels is largely subjective.

I’m not going to say the Ruger DA trigger equals the old S&W trigger, but I will say the Rugers get some grief they don’t deserve. The S&W actions, particularly the older ones, are incredibly good but the Ruger trigger isn’t horrible.

The S&W and Ruger actions have significant design differences. Because the Ruger has a removable trigger group and no removable side plates, some of the geometry is different. It’s not bad, just different. That coupled with Ruger’s use of a hammer strut and coil type hammer spring, makes the feel of the trigger pull different from the S&W. The DA Six series Rugers also use a mousetrap style trigger return spring (this feature is changed in the GP-100/SP101 models).

As much as I like the DA Ruger revolvers, I must be honest about the internal finish of the Ruger action from the factory. I think the word “adequate” is a fair description of the internal finish of the Ruger lock work. It’s not terrible but there is room for improvement.

With a little work and maybe some springs and shims, I can make the trigger pull of a Ruger DA Six series or GP-100 the equal of a 1990’s (Tomkins era) stainless steel S&W. No amount of magic will make a Ruger DA revolver action like a 1950’s carbon steel S&W DA revolver. However, that doesn’t mean the Ruger DA is unserviceable or horrible.
 

Creeker

Well-Known Member
The DA Ruger triggers aren't bad especially if tuned. They can certainly be learned & shot well. On the other hand, I like the NM Ruger triggers, once tuned a little, better than any SA I've shot. Much of it is training to your horse.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
While I have cleaned up a few SA triggers, I have far more experience with DA actions. The Ruger DA actions can be noticeably improved.
I've never heard the term "training to your horse" but I like that phrase. It brings to mind the ability to instinctively know how the clutch engages on a vehicle that you've driven for years. Even if you drive multiple vehicles, when you get in that old one that you have hundreds of hours in, it just "clicks" with you.
DA revolvers are a bit like that.
 

Creeker

Well-Known Member
While I have cleaned up a few SA triggers, I have far more experience with DA actions. The Ruger DA actions can be noticeably improved.
I've never heard the term "training to your horse" but I like that phrase. It brings to mind the ability to instinctively know how the clutch engages on a vehicle that you've driven for years. Even if you drive multiple vehicles, when you get in that old one that you have hundreds of hours in, it just "clicks" with you.
DA revolvers are a bit like that.
Exactly. Just because something is better doesn't mean you'll do better with it. It's like David before he walked into the valley. He couldn't wear Saul's armor or use his weapons because he hadn't proved them. He did however know his sling. That horse he had trained.