Today at the range with 303 Brit

KHornet

Well-Known Member
The 303 Brit is probably one of the most ugly rifles ever made for the military, and mine is uglier than most, and it is cobbled together from parts from various rifles from various years of mfg. The wood is brown, almost black brown, and probably has the capacity to have oil wrung out of it. I got it from a guy at a gun show, a couple of years ago for (if I remember right) about 125.)) or so. The bbl was dark, very dark and still is, but no pits. I spent a lot of time with solvents, brushes, and patches but no brightening, but the lands aren't bad.
I bought it strictly to play with cast. Considering that the Brit standard for the 303 in the hands of the average foot soldier was 4 MOA, with my cast loads, it will do that and a bit more. Have never slugged it, but it tolerates .314's, and likes .315s just fine. Shot today with 170 ranch dogs, .315 over 16 gr of 2400. Shot two 5 shot groups, one with fill the other without fill. At 50 yds, and on the same target, I had two distinct groups, one about 2" higher than the other. The top one (with fill) went into about an inch and a half, the bottom one (no fill) shot a vert string of 4 into right at an inch, but then I popped the last one out to about 2". The Total grouping of the two groups together was right at 3". Issue sights are nothing to write home about, but with my eyes, am quite satisfied with the rifle. That is particularly true when I see 303's at Caballes (sp) with price tags above the 300.00 mark. Would like another one, with a nicer appearance, but not willing to pay the price they want. Anyhow, am pleased with the way the old girl shoots. She is far older than me, and I am about older than dirt.
 

KHornet

Well-Known Member
As close as I can figure the rifle is a Mark I, with windage adjustable sight, probably produced in the 1910-1920 time frame. Am sort of fascinated with old milsurps. After I find the best accuracy loads for the 303 and the 7.65x55 Swill, will start working on the Swed 6.5x55 and the M91 Mosin Nagant. Wishing I had bought an Argentine Mauser when they were less than 100.00, same for a 98 Mauser.
Oh Well!
 
Last edited:

Bret4207

At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
Sounds like my gun rack! The Argentine, if you mean the '91, is almost boringly easy to get to shoot good. Mine likes darn near anything that will chamber. And oddly enough, that thing carries like a dream, sort of reminds me a Penn style long rifle when walking the woods with it. Sights are the limiting factor, but it's worlds nicer than carrying an issue SMLE, 98 Mauser or 03 Springfield, at least for me.
 

KHornet

Well-Known Member
Bret, almost any thing beats the carry of a SMLE! That said all milsurps have something to offer. I bet that 91 does carry and shoot well.
 
9

9.3X62AL

Guest
Darn you anyway, Bret. Buckshot has a couple 1891s for sale right now, and JUST WHAT I NEED is ANOTHER caliber to ride herd on. I SEE NOTHING.....NOTHING.

I have a pretty nice 1918 BSA No. 1 Mk III whose bore is a bit wide and casual, but it will produce 2.5"-3" 5-shotters at 100 yards if I hold my mouth right. Recipe is a Lee 200 grainer (semi-custom) that falls out at .3175" or so in 92/6/2 and sizes to a couple tenths larger than .316" in a Buckshot H&I die of same diameter, atop 16.0 grains of 2400 (none too creative, that). One can only wonder what stories this old warhorse could tell. The SMLE's do look like a committee project, but there is a lot of truth to the old saying that the Germans had the best hunting rifle--the Americans fielded the best target rifle--but the British used the best battle rifle of the First World War.
 

KHornet

Well-Known Member
Old sayings were and still are true Al. And I agree with that one in particular!
 
Last edited: