Going by the pictures posted by the OP, in particular the 3rd photo, the point appears to be flat. There is a generous radius leading into that flat point that gives it a little more rounded appearance from the side views. I would call that bullet a SWC but if you want to call it something else, that's not a deal breaker for me.
I did notice the lube groove had a rounded bottom; something Keith wouldn't have tolerated easily. Keith had a strong preference for a square cut lube groove. The rounded bottom lube groove will help the bullet release from the mold but the price is slightly less area for the lube to occupy given the same width and total depth of the groove. Again, not a deal breaker for me.
The basic form of a SWC provides a fairly sharp leading edge on the forward driving band and a flat point. The differences between various SWC designs are largely the form of the forward portion of the bullet leading up to that flat point. Some folks get pretty worked up over the exact profile of that front section of the bullet; I'm not convinced those small differences make much difference in the performance of the bullet.
You can trade small changes in the shape of that forward section for equally SMALL changes in the bullet's center of gravity - but within the same basic weights and same basic SWC style - you're not going to set the world on fire with those minor differences.
I've seen 158(ish) grain SWC profiles with a forward section that was almost a pure truncated cone. There was almost no curve at all to the sides and a very abrupt transition to the flat point. Others have a more pronounced radius near the point (like the OP's 358477).
In the end, we may be discussing how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin.
