The Ruger P-85

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
The Wonder-Nine Era, one of my favorite times in the world of firearms.

Sherman, set the Wayback Machine to 1987.

But Mr. Peabody, if we want to see the introduction of the Ruger P-85 shouldn’t we go to 1985?

No Sherman, we must go to 1987.

If you were in the pistol scene in the mid 1980’s, you knew that Ruger planned to release a high-capacity pistol chambered in 9mm that would have a DA/SA trigger. But more exciting, it would have a price well below the other pistols in that class. The model was the P-85 and the projected release date was 1985.

I can remember visiting multiple gun shops in search of this new affordable wonder-nine that I had read about in all the gun rags. Everywhere I went it was the same story; we don’t have one, but Ruger says it’s on the way.

Well……. Ruger didn’t get the pistol on the market in 1985, or even 1986. It was around 1987 when the P-85 finally hit the gun stores. Ruger missed the boat, and the initial military trials. But the public eventually got a solid pistol, for a reasonable price; albeit a somewhat clunky one.

The P-85 is not a pistol that earns the labels “elegant” or “sleek” but like most Ruger products, they earn loyalty.

There’s nothing revolutionary about the P-85 design. It used a Browning tilting barrel locking system, a conventional DA/SA action and was pretty straight forward. The only really unusual design feature was the lack of a trigger pin. The trigger pivots on trunnions cast into the trigger. This didn’t win accolades for smoothness, but it did reduce the parts count. The ambidextrous magazine release was a bit wonky but it worked.

Ruger used a lot of investment cast parts in the P-85, and that probably helped to keep the cost down. The frame was cast aluminum and machined only where it needed to be machined. While lots of manufacturers used aluminum frames, most started with forged blanks and performed a lot of machining operations on that forging. Ruger started with a nearly complete investment cast frame. This reduced expense. A lot of the internal parts such as the trigger, hammer, barrel, pins, etc., were stainless steel. This may seem common today, but it was a bit unusual in the mid 1980’s. Stainless steel slides became available circa 1990. Except for some reports of firing pin breakage in early models (which Ruger promptly corrected and redesigned) the guns have a reputation of being very tough. In that regard, the P-85 is very much a Ruger.

There were numerous variations of the P-85; DA/SA, De-cock only safeties, DAO, etc. The P-85 went on to be the basis for many other P-series pistols and the family grew to include different chamberings, different slide and frame materials, different barrel lengths, etc. They all have the same lineage that started with the P-85.

The P-85 is long out of production, having been superseded by several generations of P-series guns. The P-85 doesn’t get much love these days, but it deserves its place in American history.
 
Last edited:

BBerguson

Official Pennsyltuckian
I bought one right around 1987. It was clunky and heavy but it shot fairly well. It kind of felt like shooting a 45 acp because the size and bulk of it took the snap out of the 9mm so it was quite comfortable to shoot. Way too big to conceal in anything but a backpack and yes it was ugly, uglier than 10 days of sin actually. I finally sold it last year and all of my Rugers as I’ve never been a Ruger fan and used the money to buy other guns.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Tell ya what--I flat-out LOVE my Ruger P-89X. It is as accurate and as reliable as my SIG P-226, and that "X" suffix indicates its best OEM accessories--a swap barrel and lighter-tension recoil spring in 30 Luger.

Running my usual loads in the P-89 (123-125 grain bullets at 1225-1250 FPS) the pistol prints less than an inch above point of aim at 25 yards and dead-on for windage. 30 Luger rounds (90-100 grain bullets at 1200 FPS hit VERY close to the 9mm barrel's point-of-aim at 25 yards. My favorite stunt is to use the heavier 9mm recoil spring and run Lyman #311419 (flatnose GC of 92 grains) at 1500 FPS atop rated-R weights of AA-7 powder. LOUD, but fun. Accurate, too.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
I think the early P-series Ruger's are mostly notable for their place in history.
By the late 1980's the market for that class of pistol was very crowded. Ruger went with their signature tactic, which is to make a strong gun at a low cost. But Ruger was late to the wonder-nine party.
By the late 1980's Beretta had won the U.S. military contract. The Beretta 92 series was also very popular with LE and in high demand in civilian sales. S&W third generation pistols were in production. The SIG 226 was selling well. Glock had landed and established a strong beach head in the U.S.A.
By the time the P-85 was released, the battle for market share was raging.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
CZ93X62 - that P-89X is a rare bird. I have read about them, but I don't recall ever seeing one.
Cool concept. The SIG P-210 had that option,....at about 4 times the price.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
It took a while for the Wonder Nine concept to take hold, but once it did "KATIE BAR THE DOOR!" In this country, the 9mm's chief obstacle to overcome has always been the weak-sistered ammo loaded for it in the States, which relegates the caliber to a "Bottom-feeding 38 Special" status & power level. As loaded in Europe, it runs closer to 357 Magnum velocities than to 38 Special intensity--1250 FPS for a 125 grain bullet, while the 38 Special +P yields about 950 FPS and the 357 about 1425 FPS (4" barrels in all 3 calibers, my own arms).

The 30 Luger as loaded in the USA runs close to European ballistics. The EXPENSIVE AS ^&%$ Winchester 30 Luger loads impart about 1215-1230 FPS to their 93 grain FMJ/RN bullets, and they do a fine job of defeating Threat Level IIA soft body armor front panels posted on played-out Igloo coolers. The 7.62 x 25 Tokarev (@ 1400 FPS) run through the cooler and lodge in the armor's back panel, while the CZ-52-fired Czech FMJ loads (1700 FPS) run through & through both panels effortlessly. You don't want that Czech-level ammo in any TT-30/33 or Broomhandle Mauser--it was meant for the PPSh submachine guns and the CZ-52s only.

Ahem.......the 30 Luger is an impressive cartridge, even in its USA loadings. I am pretty sure that Ruger used the W-W factory loads to "rate" its 30 Luger recoil spring, which is captive on its guide rod; the 9mm recoil spring is heavier-gauge wire and extends past its guide rod end, and has no E-clip retaining its spring. Fiocchi ammo ran about the same velocity and ran as flawlessly as the W-W ammo did.

Bar-Sto Barrels makes aftermarket conversion barrels in 30 Luger caliber to fit several Glock 9mm platforms. They also can provide lighter-tension recoil springs to help run the pistols reliably. IME with the Ruger, the 30 Luger/90-100 grain bullet combo needs at least 1300 FPS from AA-7 powder to run reliably with the 9mm recoil spring in place. FYI.

I have never considered the 30 Luger to be anything but a varmint and target/plinker caliber. Run past 1200 FPS with a controlled-expansion bullet of some kind, it may be a viable choice as goblin repellent; the 32 Magnum and 327 Federal are deemed capable of such work, and one of the last homicides I dealt with at work involved a 325# drug dealer whose cash-handling skill set was remiss, and he got "Chalked up" via three 32 Magnum rounds--old-school Hornady JHPs from Federal factory loads. No expansion of the recovered bullets, but they were sufficient to cause death. Drug dealer retirement plans are quite abrupt.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
The smaller frontal area of a 30-caliber bullet, coupled with high velocity, makes for good penetration. Add some more velocity and barriers like soft armor can be defeated.
I have no use for communism or the former Soviet Union, but I'll give some credit to good logistics. The Soviets used the 7.62 diameter for their rifle barrels (7.62x 54R), their pistol and submachine gun barrels (7.62 x 25 Tokarev) and their revolvers (7.62 x 38R Nagant).
That 7.62 x 25 Tokarev round was good in their submachine guns for urban warfare but it also gave those subguns a little more useful range than most submachine guns in open territory. I doubt that was planned but it was still useful.
 
Last edited:

Walks

Well-Known Member
P-85
I couldn't get rid of mine fast enough. Clunky ??? that's a nice way to describe it. It was sorta like the Big Mac of Wonder 9's. By the time ya finished that 1st 50rds, Ya wondered why Ya bought it in the first place.
 

Rick H

Well-Known Member
Don't think of the Ruger P-85 as being late to the wondernine market. I like to think of them as being ahead of the curve. They beat the Keltec to market by 4 or 5 years. :rolleyes:
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
I've avoided this one .......

With the 336/1895 line I think it's possible that Ruger may have it's very first arm that can described , loosely , as elegant with a certain fluid line .

A lot of trucks get mods to make them to make them more comfortable and better suited to being a daily driver , vacation , or cross country rig . Most of them remain trucks regardless of what is done to them . Ruger builds and always has built commercial medium heavy duty trucks . Sure if you drive them far enough loaded heavy enough you'll break them down but in the first 150,000 miles it takes a fairly heroic effort or complete avoidance of any care at all .
I didn't have one of the early ones , I had a P95DC . It was an industrial truck chassis . It felt good , it fit well , it pointed fine , and shot well at 25 yd with everything you could ever want stuck in the mouth of a 9mm case and probably a couple of things that had no business being in one . It just lacked something that I can't define that the BHP clone has . Maybe it's just the poly frame , or maybe its chunky slide or reach to the slide release and mag release , maybe it was decocker lever . It might even have been the physical contact feel .
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
In the mid 1980’s Glock had a high-capacity pistol chambered in 9mm that utilized a polymer frame. During the same time frame Ruger had a high-capacity 9mm pistol that utilized an investment cast aluminum frame, albeit with a more conventional fire control system. Both manufacturers had found ways to reduce costs. (One with polymer and the other with cast aluminum). The Glock went on to be a force in the market, the Ruger P series struggled a bit. Ruger later introduced a glass reinforced polymer frame but that’s a different story.

While other manufacturers used aluminum frames, those frames were extensively machined to reach their final form. The Ruger investment cast aluminum frame was almost in its final form when cast and only needed a little machining to finish. Ruger had found a way to reduce cost, but they may have been a little too late to the party.

I’m not comparing the Ruger P series to the Glock, they are vastly different pistols. But I do see two manufacturers looking for new ways to address the same issue – How to make an inexpensive but complex part. They came at that problem from different angles.

In addition to the cast aluminum frame, Ruger extensively used cast steel parts in the P series guns, building on their strength in that field. I think Ruger ran with the technology they knew best.
 

L Ross

Well-Known Member
The State of Wisconsin must have bought a bunch of those Ruger P-85's. I used to see them in the holsters of State Troopers and DNR Wardens. I hope a Warden never had to try to swim wearing one of those on their hip.

They did look like just the thing to slap someone upside the melon with though, in a less lethal use of force situation that may suddenly change, to a full on gunfight.
 

Missionary

Well-Known Member
Another side note with the Broomhandle.... put the shoulder stock on it and it is 50 yards accurate for gophers. Man size targets at 100 yards are not difficult.
 

Rick H

Well-Known Member
They did look like just the thing to slap someone upside the melon with though, in a less lethal use of force situation that may suddenly change, to a full on gunfight.
Caution, thread drift:
Pistol whipping frowned upon. It the early 70's Detroit PD had an effective but highly controversial program called STRESS (StopTheRobberiesEnjoySafeStreets). It was a decoy unit that posed officers as helpless potential victims in high crime areas. There were an "inordinate number" of deadly force incidents involving this unit. A high percentage of the goblins were unable to face trial on earth. There was also a high percentage of injured officers.

The unit was disbanded after a change in city administrations and the officers were put on regular patrol. One of the highly decorated former STRESS officers was put on foot patrol alone in a very tough area. He found himself jumped by multiple assailants and while going down to the ground managed to swing his portable radio (PREP) at one of the assailants. In those days the PREP was a heavy metal monstrosity. In any event the blow struck the assailant in the head and killed him. The officer had been knifed and injured in the melee but after seeing the one fellow go down and the uniformed officer draw his gun the other assailants fled. They charged the officer with manslaughter for using an unapproved weapon in an unapproved manner.

During his career that particular officer had been shot, stabbed/slashed twice, stuck with a crowbar and numerous other heavy objects.....he had also been the survivor in multiple deadly force incidents including the one above. He was found NOT GUILTY of the manslaughter charges. He never worked in law enforcement again after that.

The point of all this? Be careful slapping anyone upside the head.
 

Rick

Moderator
Staff member
I've never had a P-85 but had a P-90. P-90 was much like the P-85 except it was for men. :)
 

Outpost75

Active Member
I worked in Ruger's engineering dept. during development of the P85. Not known for its target accuracy but ammo wise it ate anything. A bunch were made for export in .30 Luger. I fired demos of it at the SOF convention in Las Vegas as well as with the Mini Thirty which appeared at the same time.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
The State of Wisconsin must have bought a bunch of those Ruger P-85's. I used to see them in the holsters of State Troopers and DNR Wardens. I hope a Warden never had to try to swim wearing one of those on their hip.

They did look like just the thing to slap someone upside the melon with though, in a less lethal use of force situation that may suddenly change, to a full on gunfight.
Wisconsin State Police did use the P-85