Bret4207
At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
I'm willing to bet that there have been more fatalities attributed to the 9 mm than the 45 ACP. After all, it is the choice of NATO, most police departments as well as the street gangs.
Actually the 9mm has fallen out of favor with LE. It's still in use, but not in the numbers it was. Which brings me to real world experience. I was issued a 357 mag Smith when I started as a Trooper. The vast majority of our shooting was car struck deer and the occasional livestock. Using 158 sp 357 ammo I was good on the majority of deer out to 75 yards, maybe a bit more. A good shot in the heart area gave you dead deer, to say nothing of head shots of closer animals. Then the recoil shield issue popped up and for many months we were issued 38 +P ammo. The results were disappointing. Range was cut by a good 25 yards and they didn't drop as fast. The guns were fixed, mag ammo returned and we went back to "normal". Fast forward several years. The 9mm fans prevailed upon Division to go for the bottom feeders. This was in the era of the FBI study that said a 147 gr subsonic round was the ticket. It sucked. I have witnessed that round failing to penetrate the skull of an average whitetail deer. It was awful. After a few years we went to the 115 gr +P+ and it was better, about like the 38+P. Later we switched to the 45GAP. That knocks deer over just fine thank you very much, but is harder to hit with at extended ranges, partly due to it being in Glock with a NY trigger.
I can load my 38's to 357 mag level, well over 1200 fps with a 150-160 gr bullet. I don't believe that can be done with a 9mm, but I'm not up on all the data. Where the 9mm shines is when you accept it's a hot loaded 38 and you gots lotsa rounds. I don't see that as a bad thing, the 38/9mm work fine. But they aren't a 357/40/45. Different critters.