Petrol & Powder
Well-Known Member
Not only does the TC profile feed well, but it also gives you a flat nose. It's the best of both worlds.
I have a SIG MAX 1911 in .40 S&W and it shoots extremely well. When I first got it I tested it in my Ranson rest and found it shot everything great. I use it for single stack competition, so I load the ammo long like I do for my double stack 2011's in .40. I came with a 10mm magazine and that is what I use for it. I have shot factory .40 in it and they feed and function fine.I found a new sig 1911 target,,in 40 sw,,,good buy.trying to tell myself to buy it.will it shoot as well as a 45 acp,,,typically??
Totally new to the 40/10mm scene.
Is there any reason,the sig couldnt be rebarreled to 10 mm?I like 180s as a general weight in the 10 mm. The 165s might be a good choice for a lighter faster hollow point bullet.
I have a 160 MP HP as well as a NOE 170hp. I like them but prefer heavier.
In my 40's I like 165 as a heavy a d 155 as a "carry" weight.
135's in both can be fun but violent expansion can inhibit penetration.
CW
I just bought a magnum research 10mm 1911.One other attribute about 40 S&W and 10mm pistols I REALLY like--they seem to be very dimensionally correct, ALWAYS between .400" and .401" in throats and grooves. I size my castings to .401", and things shoot wonderfully.
Your gonna like the mold. Its got a adequate meplat and feeds flawlessly. I have passed 1400 fps in my 6" KKM. My load today is 1350+ fps. And it shoots very well.Ive got the 175tc lee mold ordered,,im still studying up for a hp mold...
11 degrees with a breeze,,,brrrI shot 50 threw it today,,,got a thousand 155 xtremes on a trade,,loaded these with 7 grs unique,,,i was surprised,,very light recoil,i was expecting more...and,,these bullets suck,,already figured that...