32 ACP 311252, 75 gr. plain base

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
I bought this nice double cavity Lyman a few days ago for my new Beretta Model 81, 32 ACP
Drops nice and round at .314".
Think I'll start out at .310" and go from there.

Ben

atkX9CM.jpg


DMVslkS.jpg


59GVRBr.jpg


89IgNl4.jpg
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
#311252 has become my go-to casting for 32 ACP. I dug into my ammo cabinet and saw that just about all of my 32 ACP brass is loaded with this bullet at .980" OAL and with 2.5 grains of WW-231. These deliver about 875 FPS from the Walther PP, bullet sizing is .311" per the ID tags in the ammo boxes. I also noted......this ammo was loaded just before we left Ridgecrest, in April 2014. Tempus fugit.
 

JWFilips

Well-Known Member
Ben,
You know the .32 ACP is my favorite Hand Gun caliber! I have more Old .32 ACP's then any other
If You can fish around for the Ranch Dog design 75 grain Mould. I never got one but my old friend Jerry O'Conner From Carolina Cast Bullets
Bought one for his business from Michael when I asked him about them ( He used to run all the RD moulds) Now you know Commercial cast bullets are hard ( About 18 bhn) But Jerry used to run mine with BHN 12 alloy Lubed & Sized .314" for some of my old worn pistols ( this is before I started casting) Not sure how he is doing now because a number of years ago he had a stoke but vowed he would come back! His wife told me that she was helping him out with the existing orders.
Now these little FN 75 grain bullets are the cat's meow for conceal carry ...... Somewhere on line I saw a penetration test using a Jean Jacket and ballistic gelatin... it was impressive for a little gun.

I know there was a guy on the other side of the street that did a big thread about the 32 acp RD penetration testing
Jim
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
A 75 grain .314" as-cast reproduction of the Lee autopistol truncated-cone design would get a GREAT following. Pair it up with a 90 grain variant for the 30 Mauser/7.62 x 25 Tok/30 Luger cadre (all 117 of us in the USA), and bullet supply problems for these calibers would be a thing of the past.
 

RicinYakima

High Steppes of Eastern Washington
I will be testing this one tomorrow Accurate 31-084H. It weights 82 grains from WW+2% tin and has to be sized .3105" to fit into the Model 81.
Acc 31-084H.JPG

Accurate makes over 50 styles for 32 ACP, 7,63 Mauser and 7,65 X 25. I use a 95 grain of this style that has all the added weight in the nose for the Mauser. In the Tokarov, I am still using Lyman 311419, as I need the gas check at 1750 f/s.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Cool bullet design in the pic.

I need to get off my lazy aspirations and figure out a combo for the mid-caliber self-loaders. I have used Lyman #311419 in the 7.62 Toks, esp. the CZ-52 where things are running in the ZIP Code Ric in Yakima spoke of. For the ChiCom Type 54 Tok and 85-90 grainer of this form with plain base would suffice; the C-96 I run at 1200 or so in deference to its age.
 

Bret4207

At the casting bench in the sky. RIP Bret.
Pardon me for not keeping up with the gossip, but Ranch Dog is out of business or retired, right? I know he had a 380ACP 90ish gr FN I wanted but never got.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
the last Mold Michael designed was for the Rossi model 92 lever guns.
he basically quit when I sent him a sample of all the Lyman's I use in mine.

he gave all of his mold designs to LEE to use non gratis and they still haven't bothered.
But NOE should have most [or all] of them too and are probably cutting them from time to time.
 

CWLONGSHOT

Well-Known Member
Im looking for a light 70-85g 32 ACP mold.
Spied a 311252 HP on eBay for 150$!!!
Ric that Accurate O84H looks much better!! Any feeding issues?
 

RicinYakima

High Steppes of Eastern Washington
Im looking for a light 70-85g 32 ACP mold.
Spied a 311252 HP on eBay for 150$!!!
Ric that Accurate O84H looks much better!! Any feeding issues?
It feeds in a 1903 Colt, Remington 51, Savage 1909 and Beretta 85. In the Kel-Tec it will feed with the 10 round magazine, but not the 6's.
 

JustJim

Well-Known Member
I had a bunch of commercial 75 gr FPs that looked like a junior 42798. No idea of the mould and I could never find more, and like an ABSOLUTE IDIOT I didn't save one to have a mould made. Fed in a CZ70, Savage 1907, PPK, PP, FN 1910, Beretta Tomcat, Colt 1903, Mauser HSc, and an Ortgies. Wasn't 100% reliable in the Seecamp.

But if you find one, please post maker and mould #.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Hmmmm. A #427098 shrunk-in-the-wash would be great in 32 ACP, 380 ACP, or 9 x 18 Makarov.
 

JustJim

Well-Known Member
Good accuracy. It was a solid hitter from the Savage, punching way out of its class. I think it was profile that keep it from feeding reliably in the Seecamp.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
The 32 ACP punches well above its weight-class, period. It remained popular in Europe for a very long time for some reason.
Yep, it held on for a long time across the pond. The fact that the European's loaded the 7.65mm Browning Short to its full potential was probably a big factor in its acceptance. The HUGE number of pistols chambered for it probably helped as well.

The small frontal area of the projectile likely contributes to better than expected penetration, despite the low weight of the bullet.

And of course, it was invented by John Browning, and he was no dummy.

The rise of terrorism, particularly after the 1972 Munich Olympics, led to most of western Europe finally letting go of the 7.65mm as a service pistol cartridge.
 
Last edited:

JustJim

Well-Known Member
I've always shot Euro milsurp ball, so I don't have a "feel" for the ballistics of US ammo. I did try some of the various HP loads but expansion was nil, so I stuck with 50 year old milsurp or handloads. I ran out of milsurp ammo about the same time someone talked me out of my Savage and spare mags, and haven't found another .32 I like since.

The flatpoints provided a noticeable improvement in performance over milsurp ball on the target, and on game. Like the HPs, they didn't expand but penetration was better.