6.5X55 at the range today.

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
vR0KirR.jpg


Lyman 266469
140 gr. Loverine, sized .2665"
Hornady Gas Checks.
10.0 grs. Alliant Unique
Wolf Large rifle primers.

1st 5 rounds at 30 yards to be certain I'm on target.

QJ2LgEn.jpg


Now lets go to 50 yards. I believe this is 6 rounds, possibly 7 ? ?

2eEXJK0.jpg


This is about as good as I can shoot with Military Sights.

Ben
 
Last edited:

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
1st loads I've tried in the rifle.
Might shoot better with another load ?
Who knows ?

The bore in this rifle is pristine ! !

Ben
 

Brother_Love

Well-Known Member
Ben,
I am considering a scope for mine using one of the mounts that replaces the rear sight. No damage to the rifle that way. My old eyes do pretty good with the first couple of shots then start to blur a little after that. I have a all matching M96 with a mirror bore.

Malcolm
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
Malcolm,

These are fine rifles.
I count myself fortunate to own this one.

Ben
 
9

9.3X62AL

Guest
The Swedes ARE fine rifles. I had a pristine Model 96 example diring the mid-1990s for about a year, and sold it to a friend for what I had in it. I replaced it with a Ruger 77R within a year or so, and it took a deer for me in 2006 using a NosPart 140. It ran about 20 yards and dropped. The Ruger's bore is right on "spec"--.264" grooves and throat about 1/2 a thousandth larger. I had a .265" H&I sizer made up, and went to work using The Load (16.0 x 2400), stair-stepped from 13.0 to 16.0 grains under Lymans #266469 and #266673 (both borrowed for the test-drive). Using harshly-eyeballed castings and Hornady gas checks sized at .265", the Loverin out-shot the bore-rider significantly with all charge weights. The "673" fit the bore exactly--bore rider portion was a draggy slip fit at .256". But targets tell the tale--at 50 yards, it was close--but at 100 yards the Loverin was tighter-shooting. The Lyman mould I bought as a result of this outcome shoots just as well with its castings as the borrowed-mould's products did. Life is good.

The Ruger is like MAGIC with any 140 grain J-word. Run them from 2300-2700 FPS, and they go into 5/8"-7/8" at 100 yards--Hornady, Speer, Sierra, Nosler. Make doesn't matter. I have test series with varmint-weight bullets awaiting shoot-offs to assess this rifle's utility as a heavy varmint rig for long-range coyote strafing. Desert winds play hob with even 60 grainers from the 22-250, hoping the 6.5s reach out and dust off insolent song dogs.
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
I was thinking today that over 100 yrs. ago when the Swedes realized that other countries were using the 7 mm, the 30-06, the 7.62X54R and the 8X57 mm for military rifles, it didn't influence them.

They stuck with the 6.5 X 55 mm.
I think they knew exactly what they were doing.

Ben
 
Last edited:

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
The date on the breech of this one is 1915.
May be old, but it still works ....................
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
The "673" fit the bore exactly--bore rider portion was a draggy slip fit at .256". But targets tell the tale--at 50 yards, it was close--but at 100 yards the Loverin was tighter-shooting.

In past years, I've had all these wonderful theories , I've come up with reasons....... " Why I just have to buy this mold....".

I just knew it was going to be wonderful !

Catch is, the target gets the final say.
My theories usually went down the tube and the target had the final word.

Ben
 

KHornet

Well-Known Member
My two are I believe 1906 and 1909. Get a big kick out of shooting
100+ year old rifles with ctgs that are still strong in the world of ammo.

Paul
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
I'm 67, when I was 20 years old, the 6.5X55 was one of my favorites. Nothing has changed.

You take the 6.5 X 55 and use modern reloading components in an accurate rifle ( BTW, it is hard to find a 6.5 X 55 that isn't accurate ! ) Take this combination to the game fields and it can still hold it's own against many of the " modern cartridges."
 
Last edited:

KHornet

Well-Known Member
When I was 20 yrs old, the 30-06 in a Marine issued Garand, was not only my
favorite, it was my only rifle. Now approaching 78 rapidly, it is still one of my
favorite ctgs.

Paul
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
Paul,

Not a thing wrong with the 30-06, I have nine of them.
If I doubted it in any manner , I wouldn't own that many of them. A fine cartridge.
 
9

9.3X62AL

Guest
I don't know if you have any of the milsurp powders for the 50 BMG or 20mm laying around (WC-860, 867, or 872), but a full case of WC-860 (55.grains) under the Hornady #2630 (140 grain soft point spitzer) gives ball-ammo performance in my Ruger (2475-2500 FPS) and STELLAR accuracy. No bore trash and minimal powder fouling, too. FYI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian

35 shooter

Well-Known Member
That's a fine combination of rifle, bullet and load you have there Ben. I'd say your set for plenty of accurate and cheap shooting.
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
I don't know if you have any of the milsurp powders for the 50 BMG or 20mm laying around (WC-860, 867, or 872), but a full case of WC-860 (55.grains) under the Hornady #2630 (140 grain soft point spitzer) gives ball-ammo performance in my Ruger (2475-2500 FPS) and STELLAR accuracy. No bore trash and minimal powder fouling, too. FYI.

Allen,

I have 8 lb. jugs of IMR 5010.
You're right, it will take heavy jacketed bullet and put them into very tiny " bug holes ".

Ben
 

Ben

Moderator
Staff member
I decided that my 266469 was really all I needed for my rifles.
It shoots real well.
If it isn't broke, I'm not going to try to fix it.

Ben