Snakeoil
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I know, the general consensus amongst the shooting writers is that headwinds have little to no effect on bullet path. I did not subscribe to that opinion, but read it enough that I figured that smarter folks than me came to that conclusion. But today, I was writing up a guide for reading the wind for the guys at Wilton and it was all driven by the experience I shared earlier today regarding headwinds creating vertical crosswinds due to berm between the shooter and the target. As I was writing, I decided to take a harder look before I repeated the accepted axiom. I went to Shooterscalculator.com and ran the numbers for the same bullet at reduced load velocities. What I found was that if you took a given wind, in this case 30 mph and used the wind speed to either increase or decrease the friction effect on the bullet, it resulted in about a 2 MOA difference in bullet drop at 500 yds. That could be the difference between a hit or a miss.
I ran the same bullet at 2500 fps and the drop reduced down to just under 1 MOA. This lead me to believe that the writers are using modern HV rifle ammo as their point of reference when they say that headwinds have no appreciable effect. I have come to the new conclusion that for reduced loads that push a 200 gr bullet at about 1500 fps or less, head winds make a difference and need to be considered when picking a point of aim at extended yardages.
I ran the same bullet at 2500 fps and the drop reduced down to just under 1 MOA. This lead me to believe that the writers are using modern HV rifle ammo as their point of reference when they say that headwinds have no appreciable effect. I have come to the new conclusion that for reduced loads that push a 200 gr bullet at about 1500 fps or less, head winds make a difference and need to be considered when picking a point of aim at extended yardages.