You guys are going to cost me MORE MONEY.
I already have WFN design bullets for "multi-purpose" rifle-revolver apps in 32/20, 357, and 44 caliber. All have GC shanks to expand their utility into the 1700-1800 FPS realms in rifles. No law requires such high velocities, though--even in California, where all things not prohibited are automatically mandatory by default. A plain-based bullet running 900-950 FPS from a handgun gets 1200-1250 FPS from its companion rifle's barrel. And I REALLY like standard-weight SWCs at 900-1000 FPS in my revolvers of late. DRAT YOU GUYS, ANYWAY. This could get expensive.