Period Article: The Lost .40

Elric

Well-Known Member
Google has thrown a few monkey wrenches into searching for books. A lot more hit n miss, emphasis on miss...

I luckily saved all the digital copies of stuff while searching was much more productive.

The Lost .40
By W. M. PUGH

American Rifleman, vol 68, No. 5, page 6, Oct 15, 1920

SAID Sergeant O'Ferrall in an off duty period to his bunkie, "What's in dates? ‘Seeds’ you say, bunkie? Righto! But then its as to times I speak. What will I know at me death day? What did 1 know at me birthday? Thinking being left out o'thim two important dates, what's the use o’thinking at all?" And so say we all of us concerning the date setting the beginning of the facts now set down. “Let's not bother; sometime, say, in pre-war days"—giving the tale this mystery smoke screen—“Let's go."

A conversation starts the wheels turning; taking place at an informal lunch in factory-ville between just two gentlemen, big boys in munitions—in fact, department managers—the one in a rifle plant, the energies of the other being absorbed in a leading cartridge works. Such talks may not always with propriety be reported, sometimes it's trade secrets being discussed. This once, however, its open shop and free to all friendly palaver indeed and quite interesting to shooters, the subject in general being cartridges.

Passing over much that was said about many of the small arms cartridges for rifle and revolver, they were found in agreement concerning the merits of the .30—06 rifle cartridge and each expressed regret, that it had to date, no fitting mate in the line then made for various revolvers, automatics and heavy single shot pistols. Of course they praised the punch of the .45 Colt single action, the speed of the Colt .38 auto, and the accuracy, plus, of the S. & W. Russian; excellent each one of them in its particular sphere, yet none of them uniting all the essential factors needed in a first class cartridge for heavy one-hand guns. Later on, in fact about adjournment period, a date was set for another meeting and eating, in the hope that they might find something definite to go on in possible search for this missing link in the pistol cartridge chain.

Soon enough these two discovered that to initiate and build up, even in theory, a winning pistol cartridge needed a great deal more time than a daily lunch gab-fest. Then they made arrangements to meet at nights convenient to each and collaborate in this task, already threatening to become sizable. Fortunately, each had quite a lot of data under his brain pan related to some of the information required. This being disposed of all too soon, they had recourse to their factory files. Delving deep they turned up much of value to guide them from the pens of such leaders as Mann, Bennett, Whelen, Crossman and others. Much of this was worked over and checked against what they already knew. All of these facts and fancies being boiled down gave just one answer; their cartridge was to be calibre .40, an alloy bullet of Anderton type, say 205 grains, with a suitable smokeless charge.

An experimental arm had next to be produced, one that might be changed in barrel and chamber quickly if need be. Mr. Manager in the rifle plant took this for his special job, reporting in a few days some progress on the part of his chief mechanic, to whom he had assigned the work. Early the next week found this work finished in the shape of a Remington Navy single shot action of .50 calibre, the old barrel removed and a new one mounted, bored and chambered tor a certain sized cartridge of about .40 calibre. The barrel was six and seven-tenth inches long, exact calibration to bottom of grooves being .393 and a rifling pitch of one turn in fifteen inches.

Meantime a box of the new cartridges had been made up at the other plant. The tests following these new-thought products seemed quite satisfactory from the first trial; then, after slight adjustments, a report of the extra work was made at the two factories; then orders for a full test in presence of leading authorities; all of which took place on the day set, resulting in a splendid report praising the earnest efforts of these two munitions chiefs. And such a report just had to be written.

The firing was of course from machine rest, on regulation targets, twenty and fifty yards; first having made a trial at chronograph, getting down to correct figures for speed and foot pounds, with a reported average of 1055 foot seconds and a trifle over 450 foot pounds. “This is splendid, splendid indeed, boys,' said an old army colonel, present with official authority. “Why, boys," he continued, “we find de Palma speed and jack Dempsey punch; also, I note T. K. Lee accuracy." And so it went, with many favorable comments exchanged. The twenty yard target, be it said, showed one ragged hole for its splendid group, with but little larger dispersion at the fifty yard firings.

Here then was a winner, a pistol cartridge. with the foot seconds of the .38 Colt; almost the foot pounds of that big brute the .45 Colt: and the accuracy of the S. & W. Russian; everything arrived at just as the workers desired from first initiative; and such a compact looking cartridge, very little larger than a .38 auto, in fact, just sized and shaped correctly for a military auto magazine, not at all bulky, just a reasonably sized shell full of condensed power, ready to be loosed from its designed engine as a victorious baby; and then?

Yes, a new paragraph had to be started, after a long pause; the fact being that the next happening was a loud bang! Not the cartridge plant, mind you, nor the rifle factory. No! Just the world war. That was all! All things new had to go by the board in the long days of rough and ready tactics following; new things could find scarcely a friend; and amid all this hurly burly, exit our little friend the .40 pistol cartridge. And now as “The Captains and the Kings depart" perhaps there may come a redivivus, and so the end, with a Mexican shrug and “Quien sabe-—who knows?"
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
This sounds a whole lot like a 10mm Auto pre-cursor. It also harks back to a 9.8mm cartridge that Colt was messing around with c. 1912 with a mind toward selling pistols to Romania (Cartridges of the World, 15th Edition). Bullet diameter was .380"+/-, muzzle velocity in the 1000 FPS ballpark.

As COTW's author the late Frank C. Barnes said in an early edition of his book--"There really is nothing new under the sun".
 

Intheshop

Banned
Cool article Elric,thanks for posting.

My perspective..... bunch of good ole boys in a machine shop,what could go wrong? Haha.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
Sounds like they were eager to build a smaller smokeless faster 38-40 for jacketed .

Yessir. It took a while, but the 40 S&W largely duplicates the 38/40 from a Colt S/A, while the 10mm duplicates the same cartridge from a Win Model 1873 carbine. Guns & Ammo c. 1975 cobbled up a 40 caliber autopistol using the jacketed 38/40 bullet and cut-off 224 Weatherby belted cases. Somebody tried the cut-off 30 Remington, and the rest is history. I am NOT among the FBI fanatics who have started the post-mortem exam on the 40 S&W and 10mm calibers. If they can't handle 40 S&W recoil, don't shoot it--just stay low, keep dark, and know your limitations.
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
I have raved at length here and elsewhere about the 10mm Auto and its runty cousin the 40 S&W (Short & Weak). [Insert "Evil Grin" {HERE}]. My old shop authorized 4 autopistol calibers with varying venue restrictions--380 ACP, 9mm Luger, 40 S&W, and 45 ACP. 9 and 45 were first in 1987, the 380 and 40 followed in 1994. 40 and 45 are STRONG favorites, current estimates are about 60% 40 S&W vs. 40% 45 ACP as primary sidearm calibers.

The 380 ACP as a defensive caliber requires some care--they can raise quite a welt. The 9mm can be a serious arm, if loaded with Real Ammo as opposed to the FBI-blessed 147 grain Jello Tunnelers. Don't get me started.

While working, I carried 40 and 45. Our duty ammo in both calibers is SUPERB--the WWB 180 and 230 grain JHPs, respectively by caliber. Both are the old Black Talon/Ranger SXT bullets and loadings now relegated to 2nd-line status since the launch of Winchester's premium carry ammo lines--that no agency on earth can afford. Idiocy leaves few ammomakers untouched in its free-range state, if left unsupervised. $1.35 per round......C'MON, MANG.

The 40 S&W in a Glock 23 is my usual rig. The 40's recoil is sharper and faster than that of the 45 ACP, which is slower and more deliberate. On evildoers and malefactors, both do the job. Total toss-up. If 10mm was put up in a Glock 19/23 size platform, the Glock 23 would get sold in a heartbeat. Glock needs to develop a mid-sized platform in 10mm and 45 ACP. The size is PERFECT for CCW.
 

Hawk

Well-Known Member
My conceal carry is a Glock Model 27 ( 40 S&W) in town and a Glock Model 20 ( 10MM) in the woods ( they are introducing black bears back into east Texas).
I have 9MM models, in case the SHTF, but don't carry them.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
I'm a numbers guy . I've looked at a lot of pistol cartridges .......a lot of cartridges , 30 maybe 35 of my own , 180 gr at 980 fps isn't a long way behind a 185 at 1015 in a 45 ACP , 37 ftlb , 395 vs 432 . The load data I looked at just now says my XD is about 20 fps slow at 980 . My 1917s are fast clocking a 250 at 940 fps for limited field duty and 200s about 980 to the sights for shooting up cans . I guess that plinker would be a pretty fair business load too . My Colts in the Ruger are capable of running a 265 gr 1200 , but I shoot better with them and the 454424 held to 1050 which is only 500# or so , it's about the same as a 357 158 but with a bigger foot print .
When you get it down to numbers , ftlb , impact area , and penetration the 9mm and 38 Special ain't much to look at and the 357 looks like it only shines when you have to get though a door to get to a target . Now , we know better than that because a lot of critters have been whacked and the 357 holds it's own . We also know that faster doesn't always mean better . So me I'm pretty happy with the 40 . If one of those 40/10/38-40 BlackHawks came along I'd pounce in a second if it were at all doable . I'd probably snag a 610 if it were well priced too . I don't see that happening right away though .
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
They can be funny things at times, but I like numbers too. All of the formulae we use to quantify "stopping power" use a squared element of the ballistic equation to form their justifications--velocity, bullet weight, or bullet diameter. I like the Hatcher Index of Relative Stopping Power because it does two things that no other formula does--1) It uses mass in place of static weight to assess the projectile and 2) the element it squares (bullet diameter) squares itself empirically as it increases in the real world, not as a function of calculation.
 

JWFilips

Well-Known Member
Elric:
I will tell you that the absolute most accurate Muzzleloading rifle I own is a .40 caliber PA logrifle 42" barreled: that I built with a Bobby Hoyt 40 caliber rifled barrel! I know it is off topic being a ML But you can invent any charge you like and it will shoot deadly accurate!
I have taken a bunch of groundhogs on my property with head shots up to 75 yards! 30 to 60 grain FFG and a .40 round ball!
The .54 longrifle is it's counterpart! They are both inherently accurate firearms!
 

KHornet

Well-Known Member
A man who owns an accurate muzzleloader, and can shoot it well, will never be outgunned by someone shooting a modern rifle at 100 yds or less.

Paul
 

CZ93X62

Official forum enigma
JW--if the projectile comes OUT the front of the barrel, it's on topic. That is good to know about the 40 caliber front-loaders and RBs. My T/C Hawken 54 is scary-accurate with both its 1-48 Maxi barrel and its 1-66 PRB barrel. I would love to scare up a 40 caliber RB gun that didn't cost a small fortune. What size RB and patch does yours shoot best with?