Sherman, Set the Wayback Machine to 1985

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
OK, Full disclosure here - I have a nostalgic fondness for the 1980's, particularly when it comes to the development of handguns.

Yeah, in the 1980's you couldn't get a CZ-75 unless you escaped from a Warsaw Pac country and a .380 Auto was considered to be a "powerful" pocket pistol; but there were exciting things going on.
In terms of history we had the stone age, the iron age and somewhere in the 1980's we entered the "wonder-nine" age ! If you were paying attention to gun tech in the mid 1980's, you were aware of high capacity DA/SA 9mm pistols.

Ben, one of the moderators of this forum, has a thread about a 40 S&W load and he mentioned his Ruger P-94 pistol. That brought back a flood of memories of the Ruger P-series pistols.

In the mid 1980's Ruger announced that they would be introducing the P-85 pistol. Now that was exciting in its own right but what was really exciting was the pistol would be inexpensive. This was big news ! In 1985 new Wonder-Nine pistols were selling for an arm, a leg, and maybe a gold filling you didn't really need in your tooth.
We waited for this new wonder-nine pistol that a working man could afford but it didn't arrive in 1985. A few years later the P-85 appeared in gun stores and by that time, the market had changed. While the P-85 was a solid and affordable pistol, the prices for competing pistols had become at least reasonable by the time the P-85 hit the stores.

Those early P-series Rugers remain solid values to this day. It's not a great concealed carry pistol unless you're wearing a parka. They're not sleek by any stretch of the imagination and there's some weird Ruger tech that goes with the package. There's no trigger pin; the trigger has trunnions cast into it that act as pivot points. The barrel lock up is a mixture of old school swinging link and new style SIG squared ejection port. (kinda like a 1911 had a one night stand with a SIG P220 and the P-series was the offspring). Most of the parts are stainless steel, but not all. It's just that Ruger different way of doing things. Never bad, often less expensive, usually stronger, but different than everyone else. If you've ever worked on a SAAB 900, you know exactly what I'm referring to. In the end - it all works.

I believe if Ruger could have got the P-85 / P-89 out to the public in 1983-1984, the market would have been dramatically different. We'll never know.
The P-series guns are out of production but like the Ruger DA Six-series revolvers, they're great guns and there are a lot of them out there.
 

Ian

Notorious member
I remember a different 80s. The P-89 Ruger was about three times the size and weight of any other 9mm, Beretta put more cranks, levers, and buttons on a handgun the space shuttle had, and S&W was SO proud of themselves for throwing quality completely out the window and cutting every corner to the point they could produce one of their wonders of garbage every six minutes. I have zero fond memories except for the 1911 whiz kids finally breaking out of tradition and making combat pistol games into something amazing, and I could ride my bicycle to Ace Custom's shop back on the ranch.
 

Glaciers

Alaska Land of the Midnight Sun
Got a couple of P-85's or 89's, can't remember, I will have to look. Anyway they have the trigger from hell. Absolutely the longest trigger pull I have ever met. But inexpensive, BIG, ugly, holds a bunch of 9's. Not purchased for concealed carry as P&P points out "unless your wearing a parka", which in winter I do, but you need suspenders as well. But, it was a pistol with large capacity mags that you could have ready for home defense inexpensively when the zombie's come dragging up. Still waiting, but I think there coming. Stick it in a small ammo can with a bunch of mags and ammo, throw it in the truck or motor home and not worry about it. A gun that does not need any extra love. Did I mention big & ugly?
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
There was a lot innovation and some evolution occurring in the 80's in terms of pistols.
I'll give you the S&W "gun of the week" trend. I don't think that was one of S&W's finer decades. I think S&W got a little too comfortable with their place in the revolver market and thought they would dominate the pistol market on name alone. They were very wrong and have never re-gained their dominance in the handgun field.
The only extra components the Beretta 92 series had compared to other pistols was the takedown lever and the lock for the takedown lever; where other pistols used a removable slide stop for that same function. Considering the Beretta had a Walther style barrel locking system, that takedown lever was a pretty good solution. The Beretta 92 was also near the end of decades of evolution, starting with the Model 1951 (some aspects go even farther back). Despite all of the tiny forged steel parts and springs, the Beretta actually works very well.
I will say the 1911 platform got a boost in the 1980's with parts that you could buy instead of being forced to make. And more manufacturers were making the 1911. Prior to the 1980's there were a few options for a 1911 other than a Colt, but not many. That situation clearly improved.
 

Glaciers

Alaska Land of the Midnight Sun
So John, what are your feelings on the P-85 ? Do you think it's big enough? :D
Come on now. Your making fun of a guy that is just about a 120% revolver kinda guy. I do own semi auto's just for the high capacity rounds down range thing. But, never could not warm up to volume over one well aimed shot. Not that I can even aim that well anyway, but, one can always hope My pistol shooting is like the a blind squirrel finding that proverbial nut.
I did drag out the old war horse just the other day and shot it for the first time in maybe fifteen years. Reminded me of why it's been 15 years. I was actually comparing it to my BIL's new Ruger Security 9, which is light years ahead in every department. Kind of a nice pistol for the money. I could actually roll can's with it rather than hope.
 

462

California's Central Coast Amid The Insanity
My only pistol made about that time is a .45 ACP Randall.
 

Joshua

Taco Aficionado/Salish Sea Pirate/Part-Time Dragon
I also remember the 1980’s. In 1986 I had the money saved up to buy a pistol. I wanted a Ruger MK II. My Father wouldn’t sign off on the deal. I was twelve, and he wasn’t really much of a gun guy. He was scared of pistols. But, he was ok with my long guns.

Somehow I convinced him in 1987 that an 1858 Remington cap and ball replica “wasn’t really that dangerous”.

So, for me shooting pistols in the 1980’s had nothing to do with Wondernines. I was down in the creek bed with a handful of balls, a can of Crisco, and a flask of Pyrodex, pretending that I was Don Johnson, in an episode of Miami Vice with his trusty Bren Ten.

I’ll never understand how people complain about dirty smokeless powder, and how alox is a smoky/dirty lube. I’ve never had to wash any of my smokeless pistols in a sink full of hot soapy water.

Josh
 
Last edited:

Glaciers

Alaska Land of the Midnight Sun
I also bought a S&W 59, fine looking gun, but, gave it to one of my boys. Gave my other son a P-85. Been feeling guilty as I come to understand guns with slides better the last couple of years. Been thinking about getting them each a Ruger Security 9 in exchange for the dinosaurs.
 

Glaciers

Alaska Land of the Midnight Sun
I once bought a small box of surplus 45's back in the late 60's I think, not sure of the time. you know, the time when you could buy a 30 Carbine for next to nothing because no one wanted them.
So I gave the old 45 a try. Did not like them, didn't feel right in my hand, couldn't shoot them worth a hoot. Sold them. A lot of people rave about them, so a few years ago I thought I'd give the 45 a try again. After all I have matured some no matter what my wife says, so maybe the old 45 Colt will be different if I have a open mind and there have also been a few refinements along the way. Nah, not happening. I'm just resigned to wheel guns and old rifles. A guy has to know his limits.
 

S Mac

Sept. 10, 2021 Steve left us. You are missed.
Not familiar with the P series being discussed here. I do have a Ruger P90, guess it's in same family? The only 45 Auto I own, kinda bulky but a shooter as far as this handgun novice can tell. Definitely not my CCW of choice, resides in the nightstand.
 

popper

Well-Known Member
When the first Glock came out we had to test it for security reasons (Secret Sevice eval). Wasn't that impressed with it. Huge clunky thing.
 

Petrol & Powder

Well-Known Member
Not familiar with the P series being discussed here. I do have a Ruger P90, guess it's in same family? The only 45 Auto I own, kinda bulky but a shooter as far as this handgun novice can tell. Definitely not my CCW of choice, resides in the nightstand.
Yep the P90 was the 45 ACP version of the P89. Not exactly the same frame as the P89, the P90 is a single stack and was designed around the 45 ACP from the start. However, it handles like a P89 (safety in the same place, similar controls, Aluminum frame, etc.)
People seem to love them or hate them. There's not a lot of in between. They are bulkier than a 1911 but they are also a DA/SA design. They were less expensive than a SIG P220 or a S&W 645. If you wanted a DA pistol in 45 ACP, the P90 was an opinion.
 

Rally

NC Minnesota
Seems the Police Departments in the 80" couldn't decide what they wanted. Traded wheel guns for S&W 39's then, 59"s, then 659's. Seemed smaller budget departments, traded in blued, fixed sight K frames, for adjustable sighted L or K frames. Seemed the die hard 1911 fans found faults with every change.
 

RBHarter

West Central AR
I have a sickness I guess . I always wonder why the old High Power and clones don't seem to get any notice . It's almost as if they're some weird cult thing . Maybe it was cost ......

I had a P95DC ......... I can't say they were ugly , but fluid grace doesn't exist in any description of them . The ability to drill a hole and square it in Beretta mags was nice as I came into about a dozen of those cheap about the time I got it and just about the time the ban expired . It came with a 30 cal ammo can and 3 mags full of Glazier pow r balls . I shot it some , enough to know it had a .357 groove .
It was well mannered and nothing really wrong with it but it was just never "warm" ....made weird by the later purchase of a Springfield XD that I immediately , in the ugly puppy context , loved everything just felt right ....... because the grip/trigger feel was all shaped just like the old FEG HP9 clone of the HP .

Fit , feel , lines , simplicity JMB did it all right in the refined design .

I think probably the love/hate and the early train wrecks with poly frames and the on going failure to fix the lower receiver failures in the early poly ARs is what killed the P series 35 yr later poly frames are the system and the LCP bears a striking resemblance to the P clan ......a 9 round LCP IV ?
 

358156 hp

At large, whereabouts unknown.
Geez... I had a couple of P89s, a couple of P90s (45 ACP), a P94, an original matching PC9 carbine, and a number of Ruger revolvers. We parted ways over the years, but if the only 9mm I had available was a P89, I wouldn't feel horribly sad. Those pistols always worked for me.
 

fiver

Well-Known Member
I had a P series in 45 acp.
airc you flipped the lever up inside the mag well to take the gun down.
that stupid gun would feed anything you put in it and it would feed it upside down sideways whatever.
it's only fault was,,,, it was so damn inaccurate you had to sneak up on a silhouette target and shoot it from the back at 2 yds.,, that and it weighed about the same as your average M-1 Garand.
I didn't see another gun as inaccurate as that Ruger until Taurus come out with their Beretta 92 copies.
 

Ian

Notorious member
I'm definitely with Rich on the Hi-Power. Only thing I can say is they're crazy heavy for their demure size and must be expensive to make, but they're super-nice. If I ever warmed up to the 9mm Luger as a cartridge, a Hi-Power would be my first pursuit, quickly followed by a Camp 9 and a CZ-75.
 

Glaciers

Alaska Land of the Midnight Sun
If I could find out how to improve the trigger, for instance the yard and a half of take up in the trigger, that would help immensely. I'm not packing the P 85, I've a SP101 for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ian

358156 hp

At large, whereabouts unknown.
I had a P series in 45 acp.
airc you flipped the lever up inside the mag well to take the gun down.
that stupid gun would feed anything you put in it and it would feed it upside down sideways whatever.
it's only fault was,,,, it was so damn inaccurate you had to sneak up on a silhouette target and shoot it from the back at 2 yds.,, that and it weighed about the same as your average M-1 Garand.
I didn't see another gun as inaccurate as that Ruger until Taurus come out with their Beretta 92 copies.
One of my P90s had a barrel so far out of spec that you could drop a .452 dia. bullet (only) into the open breech and it would fall all the way through. That bore had to have been over .460! Ruger replaced it free, and it shot well enough from then on, but I seem to recall selling it because it just didn't work out for bowling pins. Enter the 1911, and we've lived happily ever after...