CWLONGSHOT
Well-Known Member
Not wanting to pollute Ben's post on adding a red dot ...
Should a lever have a scope???
Ha yup I said it!!
I was always A NO, HECK, NO Kinda guy!!!!
I do like peeps. Weather a receiver or tang peeps where acceptable.
Then I turned 40... Eyes started to decline and I added a scope on QR base/rings and then another lever got a scope cause I couldnt see the sites.
Couple years ago I picked up a Browning 92 its got traditional Winchester 1892 carbine sites. Tiny front site blade. I absolutely could not see! This one could not be changed either. I searched and located a very clean base for a reflex that nicely fit the rear site dovetail. Made by Doug Turnbull. No it wasn't a million dollars either!! It was about 70$ and fits a reflex site.
Today another lever got a optic. These eyes are approaching 60 and seeing sites are more and more difficult...
So where do you stand?
CW
Should a lever have a scope???
Ha yup I said it!!
I was always A NO, HECK, NO Kinda guy!!!!
I do like peeps. Weather a receiver or tang peeps where acceptable.
Then I turned 40... Eyes started to decline and I added a scope on QR base/rings and then another lever got a scope cause I couldnt see the sites.
Couple years ago I picked up a Browning 92 its got traditional Winchester 1892 carbine sites. Tiny front site blade. I absolutely could not see! This one could not be changed either. I searched and located a very clean base for a reflex that nicely fit the rear site dovetail. Made by Doug Turnbull. No it wasn't a million dollars either!! It was about 70$ and fits a reflex site.
Today another lever got a optic. These eyes are approaching 60 and seeing sites are more and more difficult...
So where do you stand?
CW
Last edited: