...The Winchester’92 just doesn’t look right with anything but irons on it.....
I've always viewed the 92 as one BIG step up from a revolver, especially when chambered for revolver cartridges, considering my intended use. The extra barrel length contributes to longer sight radius and more velocity, and is easier for me to steady. So, it's a little longer and a little heavier, but still handy and just made for fast target acquisition situations, where irons and red dots, even low powered scopes do their thing.
I say revolver because it's a repeater. I can (could?) shoot a revolver well at a hundred yards, but it's MUCH easier to shoot a short rifle/carbine AS well at a hundred yards. Hunting, personal protection, goofing off. If I'm serious about a head-shot on a squirrel at 75 yards, I'm going to be using something other than either of the previously mentioned.
The 92 isn't THAT much more cumbersome or heavy than a lot of revolvers firing the same rounds, but I have a friend who has handguns (single-shots) which weigh more than a bare-bones, 16" 92, or even one of my Contender carbines. Those are chambered for (no lie) 500 S&W, 284 W and 458 Lott. Those are scoped and not intended for uses where the 92 shines bright.