New Smith & Wesson Lever Action, Model 1854

Jeff H

NW Ohio
Why buy a rifle and have to do all that ? ?

Especially at that price.

All the "features" most here seem to not want are features they've added which appeal to someone who would add all that stuff at extra expense, but the extra expense comes standard, so if you don't want that stuff, you pay for it anyway, take it off and pay for the replacement stuff you DO want.

But then, I guess if it came with cheap, traditional sights, normal lever, plain wood, unthreaded muzzle, there's another crowd that would be discussing adding all those things to it at additional expense. That's what some fellas these days call a "build.":rolleyes:

EDIT: Anyone have any idea where the 1854 designation came from? I'm no expert on historical arms, but it doesn't look like anything I've seen from about 1854.
 
Last edited:

RicinYakima

High Steppes of Eastern Washington
Not 100% sure about this, but I think Smith bought Walter Hunt's patent of the "Rocket Ball".

The one and only gun I ever sold was a Volcanic carbine.
I think he did, and found out it was a dead end. His patent was for the Flaubert cap, powder and lead bullet all in one unit. Perfected it became the 22 Short.
 

Bazoo

Active Member
I think he did, and found out it was a dead end. His patent was for the Flaubert cap, powder and lead bullet all in one unit. Perfected it became the 22 Short.
I've never heard that. Could your offer some sources for it or reading on it? Not doubting you, I am interested. Thanks.
 

Edward R Southgate

Component Hoarder Extraordiniare
Lost me with the rail, huge front sight ramp, and big loop lever. The cost is a major turnoff as well.

Hard Pass from me for all of Brads reasons as well as the plastic stock with the accessory cuts , don't see anything to like about it.