Recently I watched an excellent program on History channel, It was a discussion with two authors of a book called "Indianapolis The True Story of the Worst Sea Disaster in U.S. Naval History and the Fifty Year Fight to Exonerate an Innocent Man". Before the program had ended I had ordered it on audio book format. To say I could not put it down is an understatement, without doubt the most interesting book I have ever listened to. The amount of detail these two women, Lynn Vincent and Sara Vladic, through interviews with survivors or families of survivors, historical records, naval archives etc. to finally put to print was just amazing. Every aspect of the ship and crew, before, during and after the sinking was explored and thoroughly explained. I can't say enough about it, it's just that good. I recommend it everyone.
/\ Yes /\The Captain of the Indianapolis was just a scapegoat.
/\ Yes /\
The ONLY U.S. Navy Captain to be court martialed for the loss of his ship in WWII due to enemy action. He later committed suicide.
And the commanding officer of the Japanese submarine, Lt. Commander Hashimoto, testified that the lack of maneuvering by the Indianapolis was not a factor in his ability to sink the ship. The sub commander testified that there was nothing the captain of the Indianapolis could have done to avoid being struck by the torpedo's fired from his submarine.
In addition to his testimony at Captain McVey's court martial, Hashimoto later wrote to the U.S. Senate Armed Forces Committee in 1999. He wrote, in part, " ....that even if the Indianapolis had been zigzagging, there would have been no difference: "I would have been able to launch a successful torpedo attack against his ship whether it had been zigzagging or not. "
Contrary to popular belief, the radio operator of the Indianapolis WAS able to send out a distress signal before the ship sank and that signal was received by U.S. forces. That signal was disregarded by at least one U.S. Navy officer and probably by more than one receiving station. The U.S. Navy, embarrassed by their complete failure to launch a timely rescue of the survivors, shifted the blame to Captain McVey.
I'm not prior Navy, but I wouldn't think so (even a little bit).Sea battles are not fun.
It is called "Revisionist History". Every person in the military is just a human, regardless of rank or position. They have to make decisions on partial information that may be true or not true. Now historians look back with lots of information and judge people on what they should have done, thru modern eyes and morals. Nuking of Japan was one of the best decisions of WW2, now called a war crime.
I'm not prior Navy, but I wouldn't think so (even a little bit).
No place to hide, fire is bad. I slept between two Sam magazines of 40 tons HE each. Carriers were worse with all the jp and ammo.
My pistol coach was an ordinance specialist on the USS Forrestal in 1967, but survived the fire and firefighting efforts. As soon as his four years were up he joined the Marines as it was safer in his opinion.