Heck, I'm jealous of driving an M1.
What sort of controls do the M1 have? I have been reading on the Sherman, and you have
a foot clutch and fairly normal gearshift, and then two steering levers. Pull right lever to turn
right, left lever to turn left. Pull harder to turn tighter. Seems pretty straightforward, but different.
I run a stander zero turn mower with two levers, controlling variable displacement hydro pumps, took a
bit to get used to, but now can run fast and accurately when mowing. It will be interesting to see
how it is to drive, for sure. Many different driveline designs, with different techniques and capabilities
for turning and pivoting, or not pivoting. The Sherman cannot pivot (run one track one direction and
one in the other), many German tanks could.
Hmm. King Tiger, commonly used, but incorrect name. Not much chance that anyone will ever drive
one of those again. More correctly Royal Tiger, or accurately, Sd Kfz 182 Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf B.
There are TWO (!) Royal Tiger (correct translation of the German name) also called Tiger II in the British "The
Tank Museum" (saw them a couple of years ago) and a running Tiger I. I doubt that the Royal Tiger runs, most in the
museum do not. That the Tiger I runs and is driven with some regularity (it was used in the somewhat ahistorical, and
tactically foolish movie "Fury"). The story of that tank is amazing, for another time. Tiger IIs are seriously overrated, IMO.
Massively underpowered and unreliable, about 12 mph top speed. Few made, no real impact on the war.
They also have an example of the Jagdtiger, or Hunting Tiger in English, even bigger, heavier, essentially invulnerable
to any frontal shots, but also essentially unable to move, it would break down or run out of fuel before it moved very
far at all. Completely impractical, not quite, but almost a stationary pillbox with a big gun.
Bill