This is my biggest beef with SO many guns today - "styling," aesthetic features for aesthetics' sake only - unnecessary lines, grooves, bumps, swirls, which add no functional value. Most of this is not even "pretty," but just added to make the gun look uglier so it looks more "tactical."
Not criticizing the Henry or the Ruger carbine. I think the Henry looks OK and don't know what the Ruger looks like but can imagine. This concept of style over substance seems to pervade these days.
I'm fine with ugly guns though, as long as they're only ugly in deference to a focus on FUNCTION. Then, somehow, they become beautiful.